January 20, 2022

We Want To Be Free

Free to work
Free to travel
Free to learn
Free to question
Free to speak
Free to pray
Free to say no

Please arrive at the Washington Monument by 10:30am.  We start marching together to the Lincoln Memorial (approximately 1 mile) at 11:30am. At 12:30pm a wide range of featured guests will be waiting. Recording artists, prominent doctors, journalists, pro athletes, actors and premier thought leaders will give a series of inspiring talks and musical performances.

War Memorials – Moments of Silence & Prayer:
Participants are encouraged to pause near the War Memorials along the route to remember those who have sacrificed lives and loved ones so that America might be free.

At noon, along the march route from the Washington Monument to the Lincoln Memorial, brief remarks by the StopVaxPassports.org Task Force co-chairs will be followed by prayer led by Save the Persecuted Christians.

January 17, 2022

Canadian Covid Care Alliance 

Published December 16, 2021

Canadian Covid Care Alliance: “Pfizer injections do more harm than good”

BREAKING VIDEO (Click link above): Pfizer’s own 6 month report data on its COVID-19 inoculation shows that greater illness and death in the inoculation arm than the placebo arm. Plus, poor trial design, missing data, underpowered studies, passive surveillance and more.

For the PDF of this presentation visit:  https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good/

January 14, 2022

Schools shouldn’t mandate ‘most dangerous vaccines in human history’

As schools weigh COVID vaccine mandates for children as young as 5 years old, former Pfizer exec warns injections ‘are toxic by design’ and it seems obvious ‘criminal acts are being committed.’

Jan 14, 2022 (Children’s Health Defense) – In late October and early November, the self-serving members of two committees advising the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) without a second thought endorsed experimental COVID vaccines for children as young as 5 years old.

Ignoring the 99.995% COVID survival rate for those age 17 and under, the 31 pharma-servile “experts” also appeared unconcerned by reams of damning data about COVID-vaccine-related disabilities and fatalities already occurring in the 12–17 age group — unnecessary tragedies being acknowledged that very instant in a panel discussion convened by U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.).

Predictably, adverse event data and urgent frontline healthcare provider testimony began pouring in almost immediately after the FDA-CDC go-ahead, with 5- to 11-year-olds experiencing the same kinds of “terrifying” vaccine reactions as adolescents — including blood clots, strokes and other brain and heart problems previously almost unheard-of in young people.

In the lead-up to the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization of experimental COVID jabs for younger children, state politicians and municipal school districts also started to grease the skids to mandate COVID injections for in-person school attendance.

To date, the number of states and school systems announcing or adopting coercive plans, either for K-12 students or students ages 12 or 16 and up, is still small. However, the symbolic weight of the “early adopters” is significant.

These include states like California and Louisiana (and soon New York); major cities like Washington, D.C. (and probably New York City); and large school districts such as those in Oakland, California, and Los Angeles.

In addition, the New York City and Washington, D.C. school districts, and some or all districts in California, Hawaii and Maryland, require students involved in sports and other extracurricular activities to get jabbed.

In what sounds like good news, the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) confirmed 17 states — Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Utah — have enacted laws or issued executive orders that ban COVID-19 vaccine mandates for students.

However, most of the bans are limited to certain circumstances, with some applying only to higher education and some only to vaccines authorized under emergency use — meaning the ban would not apply to COVID vaccines that in the future gain full FDA approval for children.

Most dangerous ever

For decades, vaccines have been wreaking havoc on children’s health. For instance, consider the following:

So, when observers familiar with COVID injection data pronounce them “the most dangerous vaccines in human history,” that is saying something.

Dr. Joseph Mercola warned the COVID jabs are setting up children for “potentially lifelong health problems,” including serious heart problems resulting from myocarditis. As he wrote in early January:

“[T]he recent push to inject children with a genetic experiment may be one of the worst public health offenses perpetrated on a population of people who are unable to speak for themselves, do not have a legal voice and depend on adults to protect them.”

California ‘leads’

California spent the past half-dozen years systematically eliminating personal-belief vaccine exemptions and gutting medical exemptions.

Not content with those assaults on health freedom, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced in early October — apparently reading the minds, weeks in advance, of the FDA and CDC committee members who subsequently rubber-stamped the COVID shots for 5- to 11-year-olds — that his state would impose a K-12 mandate in both public and private schools, making California the first state to mandate COVID-19 vaccines for in-person school attendance.

The mandate hinges on the vaccines “receiving full licensure from the FDA for children,” which the state expects in July 2022.

Seeking to normalize his COVID mandate, Newsom compared it to the existing school requirements for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination.

However, in light of the strong, statistically significant relationship between MMR vaccines and autism — and given California’s status as the state with the highest autism prevalence — Newsom’s comparison is scarcely reassuring.

Louisiana ignores

In mid-December, Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards added COVID vaccines to the list of required school shots, overturning a bipartisan vote against such a mandate by the state’s House Health and Welfare Committee.

The push for the mandate originated with the Louisiana Department of Health. The House Health Committee then voted 13-2 to reject the department’s recommendation, stating that COVID vaccination “should be the parents’ decision,” a common-sense view shared by legislators and parents around the nation.

However, the governor vetoed the committee vote — and the wishes of citizens who packed the committee meeting to protest mandates — dismissively characterizing their objections as “overheated rhetoric.”

Louisiana’s governor and health officials also ignored remarks delivered at the health committee hearing by experienced Louisiana nurse Collette Martin, R.N. Martin provided testimony about serious adverse reactions in children and their widespread underreporting. She told the committee:

“We are not just seeing severe acute reactions with this vaccine, but we have zero idea what any long-term reactions are. Cancers, autoimmune [disorders], infertility. We just don’t know.”

Louisiana’s mandate, which goes into effect in fall 2022, currently applies only to students ages 16 and up, “but could expand as the vaccines get the highest level of approval” from the FDA.

School districts (try to) impose

In early January, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki asserted that decisions on school vaccine mandates “are up to local school districts.”

However, the U.S. Department of Education has been working with school districts, Psaki said, “to provide resources, connect school officials with testing providers, and set up vaccine clinics….”

Last September, Maryland’s health secretary disingenuously made similar comments, telling the press that the state prefers “not to be intentionally overbearing” or “interventionist” and instead encourages school systems “to take the lead in their individual jurisdictions.”

In California, school board members in several large school districts showed, as early as September, they were willing to “take the lead” in imposing mandates for in-person instruction.

The plans of school boards in Los Angeles (the nation’s second-largest school district), Oakland and San Diego have been undermined, however, by the large number of unvaccinated students and other apparently unforeseen pitfalls.

The Los Angeles school district, for example, pushed back its initial Jan. 10 deadline to the fall of 2022, because tens of thousands of uninjected students would have “overwhelmed the district’s independent study program.”

L.A. students ages 12 and up are supposed to upload proof of vaccination into a “Daily Pass” system. The L.A. district already requires students to undergo weekly testing (regardless of vaccination status) and subjects them to other measures such as “daily health checks,” masking and contact tracing and isolation of cases.

Three out of ten students failed to show up on the first day of school following winter break, “having tested positive for the coronavirus.”

Oakland’s school district will not enforce its mandate until Jan. 31, a month later than originally planned. When the school board voted (5-1-1) in favor of mandating COVID shots for in-person instruction for students 12 and up, it apparently did not bargain on nearly two-fifths of students in that age group (38%) remaining unvaccinated.

Casting the lone “no” vote, Oakland school board member Mike Hutchinson stated, “I don’t think we should be rolling out at midnight on a not very publicized meeting, talking about mandatory vaccinations when there’s nothing wrong with taking our due time to deliberate to make sure that we get it right.”

In December, however, Hutchinson indicated he would be comfortable deferring to the state-level mandate.

In late December in San Diego, a judge struck down the school district’s COVID vaccine mandate for students 16 and older, arguing the state legislature has not given individual school districts the authority to mandate vaccines for school attendance.

Not timid

An Oakland pediatrician who egged on her city’s school board to vote in favor of COVID mandates argued last fall, “This is not the time for timidity.”

However, as evidence accumulates about the injections’ outsized risks for children, it seems increasingly clear that a number of so-called public servants do not have a problem with timidity, having shown themselves perfectly willing to harm — and kill — children.

For former Pfizer executive Dr. Mike Yeadon, who has argued for months that the COVID injections “are toxic by design” and “were always going to harm people,” it seems obvious “criminal acts are being committed.”

Now is the time to push back against criminality and coercion — including COVID vaccine mandates and “vaccine passports” — in whatever ways we can. Our children’s lives, and our own lives, depend on it.

January 13, 2022

COVID Fatality Rates per Age Groups

There are several observations worth noting. First, as we have long known, people of college age and younger are very unlikely to die. The 5-9 and 10-14 age groups are the least likely to die. (Note that an IFR of 0.001% means that one person in that age group will die for every 100,000 infected.) The 0-4 and 15-19 age groups are three times likelier to die than the 5-9 and 10-14 age groups, but the risk is still exceedingly small at 0.003% (or 3 deaths for every 100,000 infected).
Second, the IFR slowly increases with age through the 60-64 age group. But after that, beginning with the 65-69 age group, the IFR rises sharply. This group has an overall IFR just over 1% (or 1 death for every 100 infected). That’s a fairly major risk of death. (The red line in the chart marks where the “1% threshold” is crossed.) The IFR then grows substantially and becomes quite scary for people in their 70s and older. People in the 75-79 age group have more than a 3% chance of dying if infected with coronavirus, while people aged 80 and over have more than an 8% chance of dying. That’s roughly the same chance as rolling a four with two dice.
Third, the virus discriminates. Beginning with the 20-24 age group, men are about twice as likely to die as women from COVID. This pattern remains in each age group through 80+.
With this data, let’s hope that public health officials and policymakers can craft smart guidelines in regard to what parts of society should be locked down and how vaccines should be allocated.
Source: O’Driscoll, M. et al. “Age-specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS-CoV-2.” Nature. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2918-0 (2020).

January 11, 2022

Study: Reported adverse reactions to COVID vaccines 18 times higher than other jabs

Tue Jan 11, 2022 – 4:10 pm EST LANGEN, Germany (LifeSiteNews) — A newly published report in Germany shows that the number of suspected adverse event cases reported in connection with COVID vaccines in that country last year is 18 times higher than the total number of adverse event cases for all other vaccines used in Germany since the year 2000 combined.

The report published last month by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), an agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health, contains alarming figures that were analyzed by German news agency transparenztest.de in an article  published on its website last week.

The data shows that in the past 11 months, between December 27, 2020 and November 30, 2021, a total of 196,974 suspected adverse reactions were reported in relation to COVID vaccines.  According to the PEI, 123.3 million doses of COVID vaccines were administered in Germany during that period.

By comparison, in the 20 years preceding the launch of the COVID-19 vaccines, from January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020, the PEI registered a total 54,488 adverse reactions from all vaccine doses administered in Germany over these two decades. The total number of doses administered during that period is 625.5 million (stemming from 400 different vaccines).

Notwithstanding the total number of doses administered, the number of suspected adverse events from the COVID-19 vaccines over a one-year period is already four times higher than for all other vaccines combined that were administered over a 20-year period.

But the reality is even more concerning than that.

In its analysis of the data published by the PEI, transparenztest.de noted that the German health agency does not provide an accurate picture of the high proportion of suspected adverse events in relation to COVID vaccines, as it fails to also take into account the relatively small number of doses of COVID vaccines administered in relation to all other vaccines in the past 20 years.

The total number of vaccine doses administered over the 20-year period preceding the use of COVID vaccines is almost five times higher than the number of COVID vaccine doses that have been administered in the past 11  months, and yet “only” 54.488 suspected adverse events were reported during that 20-year period compared with 196.974 for COVID vaccines. 

This is equivalent to 1.597 cases per 1000.000 doses administered for COVID vaccines over one year, as opposed to 87 cases per 1000.000 doses administered for all other vaccines over 20 years.

This means that the number of suspected cases of adverse events is 18 times higher for COVID vaccines than for all other vaccines combined in the past two decades so far.

In addition, still using data from the PEI report, transparenztest.de applied the same principle to cases of suspected deaths in connection to COVID vaccines and found that the number of deaths is 21 times higher for COVID vaccines compared with all other vaccines combined, with 15 reported deaths per 1000.000 doses for COVID vaccines, as opposed to 0,73 per 1000.000 doses for all other vaccines, keeping in mind that these figures come from death cases that have been reported. Some experts say cases of death in relation to COVID vaccines are still wildly underestimated, especially in Germany, due to a flawed reporting system.

Meanwhile, Stefan Homburg, a German professor of economics, has used data from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany in a tweet, showing that the number of deaths in Germany for the year 2021 has increased by 43,000 compared with 2020.

According to Homburg, this sharp increase in mortality cannot be explained by mere demographic factors and is proof that COVID jabs do not help reducing deaths.

January 10, 2022

The Real Reason They Want to Give COVID Jabs to Kids

January 9, 2022 (Mercola)


  • The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule
  • Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information
  • Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization: There must be an emergency; a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective; the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product; and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained
  • According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable
  • Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively targeted for the COVID-19 injection even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of vaccines she received 20 years ago. (Incidentally, Mayer grew up in the Oscar Mayer family in the 5th generation descended from the original Oscar Mayer, a German immigrant who started as a butcher boy. Despite Mayer’s vaccine injury, her family does not share her views on vaccine safety issues.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1990s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, her doctor recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she finally realized it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability,” she says. “I spent three years in my early 30s being 80% housebound, and I really I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a whole bunch of diagnoses: lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, Lyme disease. Ultimately, none of those made sense and none of the treatments made me any better, until we put the pieces together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally just a cause and effect. If you look back at my history and lay out my vaccine schedule, you can see that my health declined two weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive issues, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like symptoms, a 24/7 migraine, joint pain. I really had no life at all in my early 30s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical journalist with a bunch of different blogs, and then a health consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and joined Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, especially when combined, data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) suggest there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer injections for COVID.

What’s more, while lack of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the obvious hazards associated with vaccines are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most were injured so shortly after the shot that it’s hard to deny a correlation. The staggering number of injuries reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the insanity of rolling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine makers have immunity against lawsuits for injuries.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal immunity against liability because they’re still under emergency use authorization (EUA). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer explains:

“I put together a slide deck about Emergency Use Authorization (which you can see in the video interview) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these products on the market, then you understand the behaviors [we’re now seeing].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the vaccine makers and our government are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re guarding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re also going for full liability protection, and children will be used as pawns to get them full liability protection.

Vaccine makers love EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll only cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably only for pharmaceuticals and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will make you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen pharmaceuticals before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine injured is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even covered, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, vaccine injury, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your treatment out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose homes, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which pays for injuries caused by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes takes years and in the end rarely provides adequate compensation.

“If you do end up getting compensation … they don’t pay it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their injuries before they get compensated.

That’s been said to me a bunch of times by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only compensated 3% of claims. And so far, there have been no approvals for [compensation] for COVID shot injuries,” Mayer says. [Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently determined “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated.1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slide show, Mayer reviews each of the stages of product liability, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine makers have no liability as long as their product is under EUA, as the product is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental,” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it directly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on [without consent]. We always have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[The Nuremberg Code] is not a law, but it’s a code under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal laws as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical segregation, medical apartheid [because that is a form of coercion or duress.] So, if you go to a restaurant and they demand your vaccine passport, only let you eat outside, and they might not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical segregation.

That is illegal and I do not support businesses that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access privileges that are different between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual indication of vaccine status like a sticker or a bracelet … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid, [since they are all forms of coercion or duress.]”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not make something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles an hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs suddenly changed to 100 miles per hour? No, it’s not going to happen. Mass violation of the law has never made anything legal. And just because schools and businesses and our government are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it legal. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these [COVID shots]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal mandates will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stage is full licensure (FDA approval). Once a product is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for injuries. At that point, the product can be legally mandated. Of course, knowing how dangerous the COVID shots are, no manufacturer wants to be financially liable for injuries. They’d be sued out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule. ~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against liability again, the vaccine manufacturers need to get their product onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As noted by Mayer:

“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical ‘Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld,2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive consequences such as dishonorable discharge or other punishments. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural consequence of possibly getting the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the term “consequences” just for the COVID shot, to suggest that punitive consequences, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning location, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive consequence, has never been adjudicated,” Mayer says. “That’s not in any law. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it absolutely means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so people give it a lot of authority.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s just beyond reason — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by taking it, but it’s purely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not adjudicated, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an opinion. It holds no legal weight at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Services has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t just mean vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical masks.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as measured by a fourfold increase in antibody levels, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, the efficacy threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another departure from prior vaccine approvals, the COVID vaccine clinical trials relied on the RT-PCR test, not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first rolled out, but that was relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two parameters is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%.3

For example, if a study divided people into two groups of 1,000 and two people in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine got infected, while only one in the vaccinated group got infected, the relative risk reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of absolute risk reduction, the fictional vaccine only prevented 1 in 1,000 from getting the infection — a very poor absolute risk reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative risk reduction bottoms out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were manipulated as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns [that showed] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial [data], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%,”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence showing they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed,” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a fully approved product in the U.S., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool,” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to take your EUA products off the market … by law. I put [state of] emergency and [treatment] alternatives in red, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super scary to keep the emergency going. So, the variants serve a purpose. You have to think about these variants in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their products on the market.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox did in the early 1900s [even though] only 5% of people were vaccinated. [But it won’t] go away [until] the shots get full approval and the manufacturers get a full liability shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The answer is more complex than a simple yes or no. Mayer explains:

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get liability protection. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they want. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full liability.

There’s all this confusion about Comirnaty. Was it fully approved? Is it on the market? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it make the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No, no, no, no.

The FDA issued an intentionally confusing biological license application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s ‘interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s ‘legally distinct.’

In that same approval, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they want the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So, [Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United States. It’s available in the U.K., New Zealand and other places, but it is not available in the United States because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only ‘ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they buried this language in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said; ‘We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for use in individuals 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You would think the age break would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16- and 17-year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer gets full liability protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up, not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s also legally distinct. Courts have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal judge recently rejected the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That means Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandate. They filed an amended complaint seeking a new injunction after the judge last month rejected the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[Editor’s note: This information is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and courts may issue new rulings. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear arguments challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing mandates.]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as fully approved? First, the approval states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That means it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have liability protection. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative [treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on the market.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or collapsed on the field, and children in schools have died of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be sued is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they declare it here, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a deal, but it’s a very big deal. Young people are dying [from the shots] who have a 99.9973% chance of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended schedule for children, because then it gets full liability protection according to the 1986 Act. This is why they’re going after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery rate …

Every medical intervention is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for kids at all. They should never be getting COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent cases. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

Special Alert Notice

Border Law Enforcement Public Event in McAllen, Texas

Come learn how YOU can help defend America’s borders

Jan 29th and 30th 2022

Click HERE for more information

Hosted by Take Action

January 7, 2022

Contrary to popular belief, there’s still no FDA-approved COVID jab in the US (Scroll down to below cartoon for article)

The decision for parents to homeschool their children is now an obvious one with the onslaught of anti-family, anti-Christian agendas and useless, even harmful, masks and vaccines being forced on students at both public and private schools.

(Click below for video)

Debunking the myths of homeschooling: The joys of learning with family

Contrary to popular belief, there’s still no FDA-approved COVID jab in the US

Thu Jan 6, 2022 (The Dossier) – I fact checked the fact checkers and couldn’t believe what I found. Despite the corporate press, Big Pharma, and the federal government telling us otherwise, it is absolutely true that there is no FDA approved COVID-19 vaccine available in the United States today. And there are no plans to make one available any time soon.

I know it’s hard to believe, but it’s 100% true. And this reality hints at an incredible scandal within both Big Pharma and the U.S. Public Health bureaucracy.

On August 23, the FDA granted full approval for a COVID-19 vaccine to Pfizer-BioNtech for a specific product sold under the brand name Comirnaty. The landmark moment — the “full approval” endorsement from the FDA — was heralded by the Biden Administration and countless states, and quickly leveraged to coerce millions into taking the shots. This product, Comirnaty, was fully authorized for the “prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.”

Yet Comirnaty itself has never made its way into the United States. The fully-approved version is nowhere to be found within our borders.

A separate product, which remains under emergency use authorization (EUA), is the only “Pfizer shot” available in the United States.

Early on, Pfizer and its government allies seemed to have a reasonable explanation for this issue. They claimed that Comirnaty was not yet available because the EUA shots were still lining the shelves, and claimed that the FDA-approved version would be available to all soon.

Now, it’s been over 4 months since full approval, and Comirnaty is still not being distributed.

The FDA has recognized Comirnaty as a “legally distinct” product with “certain differences,” but claims it does not impact safety or effectiveness of the shots. “Fact checkers” leverage the latter point of safety and efficacy to claim that people are still getting access to ingredients akin to the fully approved product.

But here’s the issue: they have yet to explain why people still can’t get Comirnaty, now 128 days after full approval. [Originally written December 29, 2021]

And if it is the case that the two products are the exact same thing, the FDA has not explained why they only approved a distinct product named Comirnaty, and not the injection currently being sold under the EUA label. Why won’t the FDA approve the EUA product?

The CDC continues to confirm that Comirnaty is “not orderable at this time.” Moreover, the CDC currently states that “Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these NDCs (National Drug Codes) and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution.”

CDC website

Now, back to the trillion dollar EUA question.

Is Pfizer refusing to make the fully authorized version available, while continuing to sell an EUA product because doing so could open up Pfizer and BioNTech to legal liability issues?

Pfizer and an HHS spokesperson talked to The Washington Post in a previous “fact check,” and claimed that there’s no additional legal immunity benefits between the EUA product and Comirnaty. However, these entities have never explained why Pfizer and the federal government would go through the trouble of recognizing two legally distinct products.

An EUA fully protects the drugmaker and grants zero legal recourse to the patient. This surefire protection measure was bolstered by the PREP act and other measures implemented to shield COVID companies from liability.

Now, here’s where it all gets very nefarious.

Due to a law passed during the Reagan Administration, in order for drug makers to be granted more robust legal liability protection for their vaccines, they must first secure full approval for the children’s version of their shot. Steve Kirsch has explained this at length last month on his Substack. Additionally, Robert Kennedy Jr mentioned it on a recent podcast with Mikhaila Peterson. I looked into these claims extensively, and they appear accurate. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), which was passed into law in 1986, provides a legal liability shield to drug manufacturers if they receive full authorization for all ages.

Is Pfizer seeking approval for children so that it can protect itself from lawsuits? The company is working with regulators, even clandestinely altering vaccine ingredients (a process that should require them to get full approval for an entirely separate product), in a seeming bid to clear the path to legal indemnity.

Pfizer has been enabled to change formulations on no publicly available data

New – “Gray Cap” 12+ vax w/Tris (never trialed in any age for the Pfizer 💉)

Public 5-11 yos are 1st to receive Tris formulation, clinical trial was PBS.

FDA memo unclear on Comirnaty or BNT162b2 pic.twitter.com/ytwrIbCkOw

— Jean Rees (@JeanRees10) December 29, 2021

Surely, there’s also a monetary incentive in play, but maybe there’s another reason why Pfizer, Moderna, and others are working relentlessly to authorize their products for children, who face near-zero risk from COVID-19, but continue to showcase alarming side effects from the vaccine. A vaccine on the children’s schedule provides a definitive, government-incentivized liability boost.

New Hong Kong study finds a 1-in-3000 adolescents developed myocarditis following vaccination

“There is a significant increase in the risk of acute myocarditis/pericarditis following Comirnaty vaccination among Chinese male adolescents, especially after the second dose.” pic.twitter.com/0WG9PYKDGM

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) December 27, 2021

once-healthy 12 yr old Maddy de Garay from Ohio was volunteered by her family for Pfizer trial

After 2 doses she is now paralyzed from the waist down, in a wheelchair, has seizures & memory loss

Her remorse-filled Mom said ” we just wanted to show we believed in The Science…” pic.twitter.com/LkbusmMFB9

— Steve Ross (@trencherman333) October 16, 2021

If Comirnaty becomes available for all ages, that means Pfizer receives an extensive, additional layer of protection.

Is Big Pharma using children as legal human shields for their products?

There is currently no fully authorized COVID-19 vaccine available in the United States today, and this reality has been attacked relentlessly by the corporate press. “Fact checkers” at NewsweekUSA TodayReuters the Associated Press, and elsewhere peddled false information to cover up this absolute fact.

If you run a Google search on this issue, you will find the aforementioned “fact checks” as evidence that Comirnaty is available, when it is most certainly not available. Nobody in the United States is receiving the legally distinct, fully authorized shot. Is it because that shot makes Big Pharma and corrupt regulators more legally vulnerable than they want to be?

[This piece has been updated to reflect that both Pfizer and the federal government claim that Comirnaty has the same legal protections as the EUA product.

However, there remains no compelling explanation for why there are two distinct products, and why one is being delivered under EUA, and the fully authorized version is not available.]

January 5, 2022

Joe Rogan interviews Dr. Robert Malone, MD


Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of the nine original mRNA vaccine patents, which were originally filed in 1989 (including both the idea of mRNA vaccines and the original proof of principle experiments) and RNA transfection. Dr. Malone, has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications which have been cited over 12,000 times. Since January 2020, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team focused on clinical research design, drug development, computer modeling and mechanisms of action of repurposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Malone is the Medical Director of The Unity Project, a group of 300 organizations across the US standing against mandated COVID vaccines for children. He is also the President of the Global Covid Summit, an organization of over 16,000 doctors and scientists committed to speaking truth to power about COVID pandemic research and treatment.

January 2, 2022


Don’t be put off by the fact that he is a Catholic priest. He speaks from a position of factual research that ALL will find informative and inspiring.

Fr. David Nolan

STOP voting for what is best for your own personal pocket book. YES! I am speaking to all you lazy, good-for-nothing welfare “Give me FREE stuff” leaches and those who are too stupid or blind to admit that nothing is FREE.
Vote “NO” to all loans, bonds, and tax increases no matter how supposedly “short-term” or “minor” the lying, power-grabbing political hacks claim they will be.

December 27, 2021

Response to Dr. Spaeder by Massimo Citro Della Riva, M.D.

Dear Colleague,

I have read your response to the letter of Abp. Carlo M. Viganò. I am also a doctor who has spent more than a year and a half treating those who are infected with SARS-CoV-2, and I do not agree with your affirmations; therefore, in order to continue on the path of mutual constructive criticism, I feel I should respond. 

When Abp. Viganò writes about gene serums, he does not necessarily intend to allude to a product that integrates itself into our genome, but rather to a messenger RNA that is itself a gene molecule, since it is a ribonucleic acid. These serums cannot be called vaccines, since a vaccine is a pathogen or a part of a pathogen, either attenuated or inactivated, which is capable of inducing immunity. In contrast, the serums are experimental molecules (already used to treat various oncological pulmonary pathologies, such as cystic fibrosis and other diseases, but never until now experimented with to treat a viral infection) that do not induce immunity but rather produce spikes, which in turn must induce antibodies. The spikes are the toxic and poisonous part of this virus and also the most subject to mutation.

In any case, the reverse transcription of viral RNA is also possible,[1] as occurs with other RNA viruses, which is then capable of triggering long-term chronic diseases.[2] The reverse transcription of the vaccine mRNA is for now only hypothetical, just as it is for the DNA of the adenovirus vector: It is, however, plausible due to the presence of retrotransposons. It is known for certain that protein N of SARS-CoV-2 is transcribed into our DNA.[3] The vaccine mRNAs remain potentially oncogenic by integration or by genetic (epigenetic) interference. It has recently been discovered that the spike is located in the nucleus and inhibits the repair of DNA damage, preventing adaptive immunity.[4] Therefore, I would not be so sure that the vaccine mRNA cannot reverse transcribe itself into our DNA. 

I am happy that you mentioned that vaccines always carry a component of risk, and so they should only be used when the benefit outweighs the risk. But this is not the case with COVID-19, where the benefit is almost zero and the risks are high. We are talking about an infection that is perfectly treatable, with a lethality of less than 1%; thus there is no need for vaccination. Furthermore, the lack of efficacy is there for all to see: these serums do not interrupt transmission; they do not prevent infection; indeed, most of the time infection follows vaccination. Furthermore, those who are vaccinated are contagious and continue to infect people, thereby increasing the epidemic. These serums induce variants which, as you know, are mutations by which the virus escapes the vaccine. The low efficacy of these vaccines is evident from observing the situation in Israel, where there is a worrisome increase in hospitalizations, above all among people between 40 and 50 years old who are fully vaccinated.[5] 

An investigation in hospitals in Israel has documented that almost 100% of those hospitalized had previously been vaccinated,[6] and they are already considering giving a fourth dose of the vaccine in the nation that was the first to inoculate its inhabitants with the third dose.[7] In Norway, where the majority of the population is vaccinated, the number and percentage of hospitalizations related to COVID-19 is increasing among vaccinated patients, and vaccination has not reduced the probability of death in the hospital.[8] Waterford is the county in Ireland with the highest rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection, even though 99.7% of its residents are vaccinated.[9] Gibraltar is the place in the world with the highest percent of vaccinated people (119% [This includes the 19% who travel from abroad to the island]) and the absence of those who are not vaccinated, and yet is recording a continual exponential increase in COVID-19 infections.[10] The number of neutralizing antibodies present after vaccination is lower than in uninfected controls.[11] 

There is no difference in viral loads between the vaccinated and the non-vaccinated, and if the vaccinated are infected by the delta variant, they can be a course of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to others.[12] In the case of the delta variant, the neutralizing antibodies have a reduced affinity for the spike protein.[13] There is no difference in the viral load between the vaccinated and the non-vaccinated who are infected by the delta variant.[14] There is a very poor response to the vaccines among those who have the delta variant.[15] In almost 70 nations the number of COVID-19 is increasing despite all the vaccinations.[16] Here in Italy, the population continues to be infected and the hospitals are full, despite the fact that 85% of the population is vaccinated. These serums are proving to be completely ineffective as well as useless.

It is said the serums help people contract a milder form of infection, but I want to remind you that this infection always begins in a mild form and that before it evolves (in a small number of cases) into a more severe form, several days pass during which it is perfectly treatable. If properly treated right away, people get well. None of my patients who have been treated as soon as they become infected have ever been hospitalized, and the thousands of Italian doctors who treat patients immediately report a rate of hospitalization that is less than 1%.[17] The same holds true for colleagues from other European nations with whom I am in contact.

The treatments you call “alternative” are not at all alternative, and they have existed since the very first case of SARS (I wish to remind you that the current virus is actually the second SARS, that the virus is almost identical to SARS-CoV-1 and so are its clinical manifestations), as can be found in literature beginning in 2003. The fact that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) can inhibit coronaviruses is found in literature beginning right after SARS; one cannot say this was not known. In SARS-CoVs generally, HCQ increases the endosomal pH and interferes with the terminal glycosylation of the cell receptor (ACE2).[18] Chloroquine inhibits SARS-CoV replication.[19] HCQ is an effective inhibitor of the replication of SARS-CoV both in vitro and also in vivo: SARS-CoV-1 (viral replication reduced by 99% after three days), MERS-CoV, HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43.[20] In mice, chloroquine transmitted to newborns protects it from the lethal challenge of human HCoV-OC43.[21]

COVID-19 is perfectly treatable, but it must be treated immediately, without wasting time, preferably within the first two days. HCQ also has an anti-viral action: Hydroxychloroquine (400 mg per day) and azythromicin (500 mg per day) for at least five days, up to 10 days.[23] In China, HCQ has even been found to be useful in treating COVID-19 pneumonia, and it is recommended “to include it in the next guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.[24]

Hydroxychloroquine has all the characteristics to be confirmed as the drug of choice in the prophylaxis of early-stage coronavirus complications, and derivatives from China are being studied by the U.S. FDA as a treatment for COVID-19.[25] As much as 37% of the 6,227 doctors from 30 different nations who have cast an international vote consider HCQ to be the most effective treatment for COVID-19.[26] Colyer and Hinthorn call it “a first-line treatment,” especially when combined with azythromicin.[27] A German research group has invented hydroxychloroquine in an aerosol form and experimented with excellent results: Instead of receiving 400 mg in a systemic way, the patient receives 2-4 mg through inhalation, without toxicity.[28]

Ivermectin, alone or in association, is an anthelmintic with anti-bacterial, anti-viral and anti-tumoral activity, which acts on flaviviruses, HIV, Ebola and Zika,[29] blocks the RNA virus of respiratory diseases in pigs[30] and neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 in 48 hours in vitro.[31] Quercetin is also effective in the first phase of the disease,[32] acting as a powerful viral inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2, of which it blocks the 3CL (3-chymotrypsin-like) proteases, also called Mpro, which are essential in the replication cycle,[33] and this was divulged by a printed communication of the CNR Institute of Nanotechnology,[34] completely ignored by health institutions.

Quercetin has a synergic action with vitamin C in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2.[35] Cortisone (dexamethasone and betamethasone) also acts on the same proteases.[36] Another SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor is ebselen,[37] “an organic selenium compound with anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and cyto-protective properties, studied for the treatment of bipolar disorders and hearing loss, with very low toxicity and with a strong clinical potential for the treatment of coronaviruses.”[38] Confirmation of ebselen’s action against SARS-CoV-2 comes from the Milan Politecnico [Clinic],[39] with a confirmatory study describing its mechanism of action.[40] Ebselen is a powerful inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2.[41] 

Another inhibitor of these proteases is cinanserin: Already in 2005 the European Commission certified that the treatment for SARS-CoV had been found, since cinanserin inhibits the SARS coronavirus in a significant way and is a ready-to-use drug for treating SARS.[42] This is in an official document of the European Commission. We recall that 3CL, or Mpro, is the main protease present in coronaviruses.[43] The strong inhibition of cinanserin on the replication of SARS-CoV is in [medical] literature: “The binding of cinanserin and its hydrochloride to bacterially expressed 3CLpro of SARS-CoV and of the relative human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) has been demonstrated by resonance technology of the surface plasmon. It is specific for the 3CL coronaviruses,”[44] and these proteases are present in SARS-CoV-2. “The design and development of specific antiviral drugs with direct anti-SARS-CoV-2 action can be made possible by targeting conserved enzymes such as the 3C protease.”[45] Cinanserin inhibits SARS-CoV-2.[46] A virtual screening confirmed the inhibitory activity of cinanserin and ebselen on the SARS-CoV-2 substrate Mpro.[47]

Since thromboembolisms are among the worst complications, the anti-coagulant action of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) is needed.[48] Furthermore, the spike-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 interacts with heparin.[49] When it opens to meet the ACE-2s (which are electronegative), the spike takes on a strong positive charge that allows it to connect.[50] Heparin is a mixture of mucopolysaccharides whose N-sulfate groups give it the highest electronegative charge of any known biomolecules, including ACE-2 receptors.[51] Thus heparin and spike attract one another like a magnet, taking the virus away from our receptors. Early use of heparin reduces the risk of serious development [of the coronavirus]. Hydroxyxchloroquine exercises a safe anti-thrombotic action,[52] and works in synergy with low-molecular-weight heparin.[53] Most importantly: The coagulative complications of coronavirus were in literature ever since SARS and MERS,[54] and have been covered up. Why was the grave danger of thromboembolisms not immediately divulged to all medical personnel? And why instead was it stubbornly concealed? We could have avoided thousands of deaths. As for cortisone, it is known to be the drug of choice for treating the cytokine storm and has been confirmed by clinical practice and a vast literature. 

In support of treatment there are cholecalciferol (always associated with menaquinone), ascorbic acid and zinc. In 2020, 300 different works were published about the benefits of cholecalciferol in COVID-19.[55] The D3 is important in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19,[56] it can reduce the risk of this infection,[57] it inhibits the IL-17 mediated response,[58] it has a role in the cytokine storm and in COVID-19 mortality.[59] Its deficiency increases the risk of infection and aggravates ARDS[60] and COVID-19 patients need higher doses of vitamin D3.[61] It protects and prevents ARDS.[62] It is recommended in at-risk patients.[63] It helps to prevent infection from SARS-CoV-2 to inhibit the cytokine storm by suppressing NFkB, IL-6 and TNF, and to prevent the loss of neurosensation by stimulating neurotrophins such as NGF.[64] Compared to the untreated, high doses of D3 reduce fibrinogen and negativize viral RNA.[65]

By improving mucociliar cleareance, zinc removes pathogens from the respiratory pathways,[73] inhibits the “RNA polymerase RNA dependent” enzyme[74] that replicates viruses to RNA, and reduces the activity of ACE-2 receptors.[75] Low levels of zinc are associated with the worsening of COVID-19 patients.[76] Zinc supplements are recommended in COVID-19 patients and the increase of mucociliar clearance is confirmed, epithelial integrity is strengthened, viral replication is inhibited, anti-viral activity is increased, the risks of hyper-inflammation are attenuated and pulmonary damage is reduced as well as the risk of secondary infections.[77] In COVID-19 zinc is just as effective as treatment, above all if it is combined with hydroxychloroquine and azithromyhcin.[78] The hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin-zinc combination is valid.[79] Chloroquine acts as a zinc ionophore, facilitating entry into the cell.[80]

Ascorbic acid is among the most powerful anti-infectives and anti-virals,[81] as confirmed in the previous SARS outbreak[82]; it promotes phagocytosis and protects epithelial barriers.[83] A double-blind, randomized study of those hospitalized with acute respiratory infections found that vitamin C improves the course of the infection.[84, 85] In COVID-19, doses of 2–8 g per day orally prevent respiratory infections and 6–24 g per day intravenously reduces mortality in its severe pulmonary forms.[86] The sick hospitalized through COVID-19 in China have been treated with high doses (even tens of grams) intravenously.[87] In Shanghai, dozens of moderate and serious patients have been treated with high doses of vitamin C intravenously.[88] Intravenous vitamin C has been given in severe cases of COVID-19 with sepsis.[89] Timely high doses of vitamin C improve COVID-19 pneumonia.[90] Two research groups, in Shanghai and Guangszhou, recommend high doses of intravenous ascorbate for the treatment of ARDS, with other supportive treatments, including vitamin D3 and zinc.[91] Intravenous ascorbate along with steroids and vitamin D3 resolve sepsis in critical patients.[92] Vitamin C prevents complications and reduces  alveolar fluid by inhibiting the activation of neutrophils and reducing alveolar damage.[93]

Prevention is helpful with the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating glycoprotein lactoferrin, which has an anti-viral action of ample spectrum, including against coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2, and is helpful also in treatment.[94] It inhibits the entrys of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by blocking the heparin sulfate, a co-receptor of ACE-2. This glucoprotein restores iron homeostasis and reduces oxidative stress and inflammation.[95]

Archbishop Viganò is perfectly correct when he writes that these drugs have been systematically boycotted by the WHO and regulatory agencies. And I would add: These drugs have been unjustly maligned. It is enough to think of hydroxycholoroquine. Two completely made-up studies in The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine claimed to potray this drug as toxic[96]: They were discovered and withdrawn, but they served to make HCQ to be withdrawn almost worldwide. An obvious boycott! All studies adverse to HCQ are financed by the pharmaceutical industry or by agencies tied to Mr. William Henry Gates III or have conflicts of interest, therefore they have zero credibility. Beginning with the three who argued that the cardiotoxicity of HCQ (usually estimated to be less than 1%) was 10%[97], or 19%[98] or even 33%.[99] All of these studies are worthless, and the list goes on and on. 

The effectivness of hyperimmune plasma has been well known ever since the first SARS,[100] and it is also well known during this second outbreak.[101] But perhaps plasma was uncomfortable for someone who has more interest in making space for monoclonals. Therefore, Dr. Spaeder, don’t say that there are not treatments, because this makes us co-responsible for millions of deaths of people who have not been treated precisely because, although there were treatments, these treatments were denied them. This pandemic is a true massacre, a second holocaust.

Let us ask ourselves why traditional vaccines with attenuated SARS-CoV-2 have not been prepared. And why did they target the spike and not the M and N proteases, which are not toxic and do not mutate (and thus we would not have had the variants of the vaccine)? Other authors are asking the same thing.[102] Instead, with these serums that produce trillions of spikes, we have obtained dangerous and deadly effects and continuous variations that extend the pandemic. I remind you of them. In addition to the well-known high risk of ADE[103] and of auto-immunity,[104] the spike can behave like a prion,[105] therefore it is neurotoxic,[106]  it is cardiotoxic [107] and above all it is harmful to the endothelium, provoking endothelitis with hypercoagulation and thromboembolism.[108]

I remind you it has been demonstrated that the spike is sufficient, apart from the virus, precisely as a product of these serums, to harm the organism and to produce damage to the lungs, the arteries and the endothelium in general.[109] Even the S1 subunit of the spike is sufficient.[110]  These two studies demonstrate that, once the replicating capacity of the virus is removed, cells are damaged by the spike, only and exclusively by the spike. And it is precisely this that is produced inside the bodies of those who are vaccinated. Another study confirms that the S1 subunit of the spike significantly increases the pro-inflamatory cytokines (αTNF, IL6, IL1β, IL8) through the activation of the inflammasomes NFkB, p38 MAPK and NLRP3, and confirms that the pre-treatment with cortisone reducese the release of cytokines.[111]

Therefore, Abp. Viganò is perfectly correct in recalling the danger and mortality of these serums. The medical-scientific literature says so, and not only the sites which you cited and called “anti-vaccine propaganda.” Look at the European data reported by EudraVigilance, which certainly cannot be called no-vax.[112] Instead, many now see it is pro-vaccine propaganda, supported and directed by supra-national sovereign groups that have other purposes than the health of the population, propaganda based only on private studies that are worthless because they collude with the industry. Among many other examples, the example of the first study on the Pfizer vaccine applies, which claims the vaccine has a 95% rate of effectiveness and the absence of any toxicity, which is financed by Pfizer and BioNTech.[113, 114]  The same applies to the recent study on the vaccination for children from 5 to 11 years, which is called safe and effective, also financed by Pfizer and BioNTech. It has zero scientific value. Or the study done by Moderna, which was financed by Moderna, NIAID and the pharmaceutical industries.[115] All this is not science. It is a criminal scam.

In closing, I would like to remind you, my esteemed Colleague, that we are doctors, and we have the duty to protect our patients, to work for their good and not for the good of those who pursue their own interests, contrary to medicine and the life of the population. We ought to think for ourselves and not robotically repeat the anti-scientific slogans of the mainstream and the oligarchic system illegitimately governing the planet. We have sworn by Asclepius, not by multinationals. I thank Abp. Viganò for his precious contribution to the search for truth, the thing we scientists ought to always do. Apparently, the Archbishop is more of a scientist than us.

Massimo Citro Della Riva, M.D.

[1] Zhang L et al, SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516.

Zhang L et al, Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues. PNAS. 2021, 118 (21):e2105968118.

[2] Balada E et al, Implication of human endogenous retroviruses in the development of autoimmune disease. Int Rev Immunol. 2010; 29(4):351-70.

Voisset C et al, Human RNA “rumor” viruses: the search for novel human retroviruses in chronic disease. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008; 72(1):157-96.

[3] Zhang L et al, cit. PNAS. 2021.

[4] Jiang H et al, SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro. Viruses. 2021; 13(10):2056.

[5] https://www.adhocnews.it/israele-preoccupante-aumento-dei-ricoveri-tra-i-pienamente-vaccinati/

[6] https://visionetv.it/dea-in-israele-quasi-tutti-i-ricoverati-erano-stati-vaccinati/

[7] https://www.iltempo.it/attualita/2021/09/06/news/quarta-dose-vaccino-israele-calo-anticorpi-pandemia-calo-efficacia-vaccini-dati-numeri-28567896/

[8] Whittaker R et al, Patient trajectories among hospitalised COVID-19 patients vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine in Norway: a register-based cohort study. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.05.21265958

[9] https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/waterford-city-district-has-state-s-highest-rate-of-covid-19-infections-1.4707344

[10] https://www.secondopianonews.it/attualita/2021/11/22/gibilterra-centro-piu-vaccinato-al-mondo-annulla-il-natale-troppi-contagi.html

[11] Chau N et al, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Among Vaccinated Healthcare Workers, Vietnam. Preprint on The Lancet, 2021, oct. 11.

[12] Riemersma KK et al, Vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals have similar viral loads in communities with a high prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. medRxiv 2021.07.31.21261387.

[13] Yahi N et al, Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination? J of Infection. 2021; 83(5):607-35.

[14] Acharya C et al, No significant difference in viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups when infected with SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. medRxiv 2021.09.28.21264262.

[15] Eyre D et al, The impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on Alpha & Delta variant transmission. MedRxiv. 2021. Doi: 10.1101/2021.09.28.21264260.

[16] Subramanian SV, Kumar A, Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 30: 1–4.

[17] https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=testimonanzie+medici+cure+domiciliari+precoci+grimaldi+covid&&view=detail&mid=1157CE3EEF5FED45E9691157CE3EEF5FE

[18] Anirudhan V et al, Targeting SARS-CoV-2 viral proteases as a therapeutic strategy to treat COVID-19. J med Virol. 2021; 93(5):2722-34.

[19] Savarino A et al, New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine, Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(2):67-69.

[20] Keyaerts E et al, In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine, cit. 2004.

[21] Keyaerts E et al, Antiviral activity of chloroquine against human coronavirus OC43 infection in newborn mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53:3416-21.

[22] Yao X et al, In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of Hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Clin Infect Dis, 2020 Mar 9; ciaa237.

Chandler LC et al, Immunomodulatory Effects of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine in Viral Infections and their potential Application in Retinal Gene Therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(14):4972.

Meo SA et al, Efficacy of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of COVID-19, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Actions, 2020;24(8):4539-47.

[23] Raoult D et al, Outcomes of 3,737 COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and other regimens in Marseille, France: A retrospective analysis, Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 July-August; 36: 101791.

Gautret P et al, Clinical and microbiological effect of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 patients with at least a six-day follow up: A pilot observational study, Travel Med Infect Dis, 2020; 34:101663.

Gautret P et al, Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial, Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2020; 20:105949.

Chen Z et al, Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758.

[24] Gao J et al, Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trend. 2020; 14(1):72-73.

[25] Tarek M Abd El-Aziz, JD Stockand, Recent Progress and Challenges in Drug Development against COVID-19 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) – An Update on the Status, Infect Genet Evol, 2020; 83:104327.

[26] Sermo.Com (2020) Breaking Results: Sermo’s COVID-19 Real Time Barometer Study, available at Sermo’s COVID-19-Barometer Web

[27] Sass E, Dr. Jeff Colyer: Combo of existing drugs shows promise against COVID-18. 24/3/20. https://theeconomicstandard.com/combo-of-existing-drugs-shows-promise-against-covid-19

[28] Klimke A et al, Hydroxychloroquine as an aerosol might markedly reduce and even prevent severe clinical symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, Med Hypotheses. 2020; 142: 109783.

[29] Dong S et al, Identification of anti-flaviviral drugs with mosquitocidal and anti-Zika virus activity in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(8):e0007681. 

Wagstaff KM et al, Ivermectin is a specific inhibitor of importin α/β-mediated nuclear import able to inhibit replication of HIV-1 and dengue virus. Biochem J. 2012; 443(3):851–6. 

[30] Lee YJ, Lee C. Ivermectin inhibits porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in cultured porcine alveolar macrophages. Arch Virol. 2016 Feb;161(2):257-68.

[31]  Caly L et al, The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res. 2020; 178: 104787.

[32] Di Pierro F et al, Possible therapeutic effects of adjuvant quercitin supplementation against early-stage COVID-19 infection: A prospective, randomized, controlled and open-label study. Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14:2359-66.

[33]  Abian O et al, Structural stability of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and identification of quercetin as an inhibitor by experimental screening. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 2000; 164:1693-1703.

[34] https://www.cnr.it/en/press-release/9620/la-molecola-di-origine-naturale-che-inibisce-sars-cov-2

[35] Colunga Biancatelli RM et al, Quercetin and Vitamin C: An Experimental, Synergistic Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease (COVID-19). Front Immunol. 2020; 11:1451.

[36] Ghosh R et al, Potential therapeutic use of corticosteroids as SARS CoV-2 main protease inhibitors: a computational study. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2020 :1–14.

[37] Haritha CV, Ebselen, a new candidate therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2. Int J Surg. 2020; 84: 53–56.

[38] Jin Z et al, Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020; 582:289–93.

[39] https://scitechdaily.com/ebselen-a-mechanism-to-stop-covid-19-replication.

[40] Daolio A et al, Binding motif of ebselen in solution: chalcogen and hydrogen bonds team up. New J Chemistry. 2020; 47.

[41] Anirudhan V et al, Targeting SARS-CoV-2 viral proteases as a therapeutic strategy to treat COVID-19. J med Virol. 2021; 93(5):2722-34.

[42] https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/24006-fp6-project-finds-cure-for-sars/it

[43] https://it.abcdef.wiki/wiki/3C-like_protease

[44] Lili Chen et al, Cinanserin is an inhibitor of the 3C-like proteinase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and strongly reduces virus replication in vitro. J Virol. 2005;79(11):7095-103.

[45] Ahmad Abu Turab Naqvi et al, Insights into SARS-CoV-2 genome, structure, evolution, pathogenesis and therapies: Structural genomics approach. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020; 1866(10):165878.

[46] Jin Z et al, Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020; 582:289–93.

[47] https://informa.airicerca.org/it/2020/06/24/minireview-mpro-la-principale-proteasi-di-sars-cov-2-e-i-suoi-inibitori

[48] Tang N et al, Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1094-9.

[49] Thachil J, The versatile heparin in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18(5):1020-2.

[50]  Kucherova A et al, Modeling the opening SARS-CoV-2 spike: investigation of its dynamic electro-geometric properties. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.29.361261.

[51] Cox M, Nelson D, Lehninger, Principles of Biochemistry. N.4, Freeman. 2004, p. 1100. ISBN 0-7167-4339-6.

[52] Espinola RG et al, Hydroxychloroquine reverses platelet activation induced by human IgG antiphospholipid antibodies. Thromb Haemost. 2002; 87:518-22.

Szymezak J et al, Hydroxychloroquine: a new therapeutic approach to the thrombotic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome. Rev Med Interne. 2010; 31(12):854-7.

Petri M, Use of hydroxychloroquine to prevent thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus and in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011; 13(1):77-80.

Schmidt-Tanguy A et al, Antithrombotic effects of hydroxychloroquine in primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients. Thromb Haemost JTH. 2013; 11:1927-9.

Million M et al, Thrombosis and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome during acute Q fever. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(29):e7578.

Miranda S et al, Hydroxychloroquine reverses the prothrombotic state in a mouse model of antiphospholipid syndrome: Role of reduced inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0212614.

[53] Oscanoa TJ et al, A pharmacological perspective of chloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 infection: An old drug for the fight against a new coronavirus? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(3):106078.

[54] Dimitrios Gianni et al, Coagulation disorders in coronavirus infected patients: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and lessons from the past. J Clin Virol. 2020; 127:104362.

Wu YP et al, Analysis of thrombotic factors in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients. Thromb Haemost 2006; 96(01): 100-101.

[55] Isaia G, D’Avolio A et al, Vitamina D nella prevenzione e nel trattamento del COVID-19: nuove evidenze. Accademia di Medicina di Torino. 2020. https://www.comune.torino.it/pass/salute.

[56] Laird E et al, Vitamin D and Inflammation: potential implications for severity of Covid-19. Ir Med J. 2020; 113(5):81.

[57]  D’Avolio A et al. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentration are lower in patients with positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Nutrients. 2020; 12(5): 1359.

[58] Fiorino S et al. Cytokine storm in aged people with CoV-2: possible role of vitamins as therapy or preventive strategy. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020; 32(10): 2115-31.

[59] Daneshkhah A et al, Evidence for possible association of vitamin D status with cytokine storm and unregulated inflammation in Covid-19 patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020; 32(1): 2141-58.

[60] Quesada-Gomez JM et al, Vitamin D receptor stimulation to reduce acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infections: Revised Ms SBMB 2020_166. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020; 202:105719.

Merzon E et al, Low plasma 25(OH) vitamin D level is associated with increased risk of Covid-19 infection: an Israeli population-based study. FEBS J. 2020; 287(17): 3693-3702.

Boucher B, Vitamin D status as a predictor of Covid-19 risk in Black, Asian and other ethnic minority groups in the UK. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36(8): e3375.

[61] Grant WB et al, Evidence that Vitamin D Supplementation could reduce Risk of Influenza and Covid-19 Infections and Death. Nutrients. 2020; 12(4): 988.

[62] Malaguarnera L, Vitamin D3 and potential treatment adjuncts for Covid-19. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11): 3512.

[63] Nurshad A, Role of vitamin D in preventing of Covid-19 infection, progression and severity. J Infect Public Health. 2020; 13(10): 1373-80.

[64] Yi Xu et al, The importance of vitamin D metabolism as a potential prophylactic, immunoregulatory and neuroprotective treatment for Covid-19. J Transl Med. 2020; 18(1): 322.

[65] Rastogi A et al, Short term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, study (SHADE study). Postgraduate Med J. 2020. Doi: 10.1138/postgradmedj-2020-139065.

[66] Jain A et al, Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers. Sci Rep. 2020; 10:20191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77093-z

[67] Entrenas Castillo M et al, Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2020; 203:105751.

[68] Kaufman HW et al, SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. PLoS ONE. 2020; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239252.

[69] Annweile G et al, Vitamin D supplementation associated to better survival in hospitalized frail elderly COVID-19 patients. The GERIA-COVID quasi-experimental study. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11):3377.

[70] Siuka D et al, Vitamin D supplementation during the Covid.19 pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020; 95(8): 1804-5.

[71]  Ysak H et al, Effects of Vitamin D on Covid-19 Infection and prognosis: A Systematic Review. Risk Manag Health Policy. 2021; 14:31-38.

[72]  Giannini S et al, Effectiveness of In-Hospital Cholecalciferol Use on Clinical Outcomes in Comorbid COVID-19 Patients: A Hypothesis-Generating Study. Nutrients. 2021; 13(1): 219.

[73]  http://www.medimagazine.it/sars-cov-2-supplementi-di-zinco-rafforzano-gli-antivirali/

[74]  Aartjan JW et al, Zn (2+) inhibits Coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA Polymerase Activity in vitro and Zinc Ionophores block the Replication of these Viruses in Cell Culture, PLoS Pathol, 2010; 6(11): e1001176.

[75]  Lee MC et al, Zinc supplement augments the suppressive effects of repurposed drugs of NF-kappa B inhibitor on ACE2 expression in human lung cell lines in vitro. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.27.428372

[76]  Vogel-Gonzales M et al, Low Zinc Levels at Admission Associates with Poor Clinical Outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Nutrients 2021; 13(2):562.

[77]  Wessels I et al, The Potential Impact of Zinc Supplementation on COVID-19 Pathogenesis. Front. Immunol., 2020 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01712.

[78] Shittu MO, Afolami OI, Improving the Efficacy of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 may require Zinc Additives – A better Synergy for future COVID-19 clinical trials, Infez Med, 2020; 28(2):192-7.

Derwand R, Scholz M, Does Zinc Supplementation enhance the clinical Efficacy of Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine to win Today’s Battle against COVID-19? Med Hypotheses, 2020; 142:109815.

[79] Carlucci PM et al, Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin plus zinc vs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin alone: outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, The Preprint Server for Health Sciences, 2020. doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.02.20080036.

[80]  Jing Xue et al, Chloroquine is a zinc ionophore, PLoS One, 2014; 9(10): e109180.

Aartjan JW et al, Zn (2+) inhibits Coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA Polymerase Activity in vitro and Zinc Ionophores block the Replication of these Viruses in Cell Culture, PLoS Pathol, 2010; 6(11): e1001176.

[81] Gorton HC, Jarvis K, The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing and relieving the symptoms of virus-induced respiratory infections. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22(8): 530-3

[82]  Hemilä H, Vitamin C and SARS coronavirus, J of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2003; 52(6): 1049–50.

[83] Carr AC, Maggini S, Vitamin C and immune function. Nutrients. 2017; 9(11):1211.

[84] Hunt C et al, The clinical effects of vitamin C supplementation in elderly hospitalized patients with acute respiratory infections. Int J Vitam Nutr Res.1994;64(3):212-9.

[85]  Carr AC, Rowe S, The emerging role of vitamin C in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11):3286.

[86]  Holford P et al, Vitamin C—An Adjunctive Therapy for Respiratory Infection, Sepsis and COVID-19. Nutrients. 2020; 12(12): 3760.

[87]  https://www.globalresearch.ca/three-intravenous-vitamin-c-research-studies-approved-treating-covid-19/5705405?fbclid=IwAR0S2E

[88]  Cheng RZ. Can early and high intravenous dose of vitamin C prevent and treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Med Drug Discov Published online 2020.

[89]  Li J. Evidence is stronger than you think: a meta-analysis of vitamin C use in patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1):258

[90]  Doctor of Growth M.D et al, Orthomolecular Medicine News Service. Chinese special Edition, Feb 16, 2020

[91]  Cheng RZ, Kogan M, Davis D, Ascorbate as Prophylaxis and Therapy for COVID-19—Update From Shanghai and U.S. Medical Institutions, Glob Adv Health Med. 2020; 9: 2164956120934768.

[92]  Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, Hooper MH, Catravas J. Hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective before-after study. Chest. 2017; 151(6):1229–38.

[93]  Hemilä H, Chalker E. Vitamin C can shorten the length of stay in the ICU: A meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2019; 11(4). 

Nabzdyk CS, Bittner EA. Vitamin C in the critically ill – indications and controversies. World J Crit Care Med. 2018; 7(5):52–61.

[94] Chang R et al, Lactoferrin as potential preventative and adjunct treatment for COVID-19. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56(3):106118.

[95] Campione E et al, cit. 2020.

[96] Mandeep R Mehra et al, Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis, Lancet, 2020, 6736(20)31180-6.

Mandeep R Mehra , Sapan S Desai, SreyRam Kuy , Timothy D Henry , Amit N Patel, Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007621.

[97] Mahévas M et al, Clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who require oxygen: observational comparative study using routine cara data. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1844.

[98] Mercuro NJ et al, Risk of QT interval prolongation associated with use of hydroxychloroquine with or without concomitant azithromycin among hospitalized patients testing positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. Doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1834.

[99] Bessière F et al, Assessment of QT intervals in a case series of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection treated with hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin in an intensive care unit. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;e201787.

[100]  Cheng Y et al, Use of convalescent plasma therapy in SARS patients in Hong Kong. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;24(1):44-6.

[101] Nguyen AA et al, Immunoglobulins in the treatment of COVID-19 infection: Proceed with caution! Clin Immunol. 2020; 216:108459.

Pravindra Kumar et al, Role of ACE2 receptor and the landscape of treatment options from convalescent plasma therapy to the drug repurposing in COVID-19. Mol Cell Biochem, 2020; doi: 10.1007/s11010-020-03924-2.

Tonn T et al, Stability and neutralizing capacity of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma, Lancet Microbe, 2020, 1(2): e63.

Perotti C, Baldanti F, De Donno G et al, Mortality reduction in 46 patients with severe COVID-19 treated with hyperimmune plasma. A proof-of-concept, single-arm, multicenter trial. Haematologica. 2020; 105(12): 261784

Chenguang Shen et al, Treatment of 5 Critically III Patients with COVID-19 with Convalescent Plasma. JAMA 2020; 323 (16): 1582-9.

Qing-Lei Zeng et al, Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Viral Shedding in COVID-19 Patients. J Infect Dis. 2020; jiaa228.

Rojas M et al, Convalescent plasma in Covid-19: Possible mechanisms of action. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;102554.

Gniadek TJ et al, SARS-CoV-2 neutralization and serology testing of COVID-19 convalescent plasma from donors with nonsevere disease. Published online 2020 Oct 2. doi: 10.1111/trf.16101

Duan K et al. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. PNAS, USA. 2020;202004168. 

Wang L et al, Antibodies with potent and broad neutralizing activity against antigenically diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants. bioRxiv. Preprint. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.02.25.432969

[102] Mangge H et al, Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2—Questions and Experiences. Biomedicines 2021; 9(10):1342

Peng Y et al, Broad and strong memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 in UK convalescent individuals following COVID-19. Nat Immunol. 2020; 21:1336-45

[103] Iwasaki A et al, The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020; 20:339-341.

Kumaragurubaran Karthik et al, Role of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 and its mitigation strategies for the development of vaccines and immunotherapies to counter COVID-19. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020: 1–6.

Wen Shi Lee et al, Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies. Nature Microbiology, 2020; 5:1185-91.

Cardozo T, Veazey R, Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2020; e13795. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13795

[104] Kanduc D, Shoenfeld Y. Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and mammalian proteomes: implications for the vaccine. Immunol Res. 2020; 68(5):310-313. 

Badier L et al, IgA vasculitis in adult patient following vaccination by ChadOx1 nCoV-19. Autoimmunity Rev. 2021; 20(11):102951

Hočevar A, Tomšic M, Immune mediated events timely associated with COVID-19 vaccine. A comment on article by Badier, et al.: “IgA vasculitis in adult patients following vaccination by ChadOx1 nCoV-19”. Autoimmunity Rev, available online 2 November 2021, 102989

Pujol A et al, Thyroid as a target of adjuvant autoimmunity/inflammatory syndrome due to mRNA-based SARS-CoV2 vaccination: from Graves’ disease to silent thyroiditis. J Endocrinol Invest. 2021 Nov 18 : 1–8.

Hotez P et al, The potential role of Th17 immune responses in coronavirus immunopathology and vaccine-induced immune enhancement. Microbes Infect. 2020; 22(4-5):165-7.

[105] J Bart Classen, COVID-19 RNA based vaccines and the risk of prion disease. Microbiology & InfectiousDisease. 2021; 5 (1):1-3. 

[106] Rhea EM et al, The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:368–378.

Buždygan T et al, The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2020; 146:105131.

Filosto M et al, Guillain-Barré syndrome and COVID-19: an observational multicentre study from two Italian hotspot regions. BMJ. 2020; 92(7):751.

Finsterer J et al, Post SARS-CoV-2 vaccination Guillain-Barre syndrome in 19 patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Oct 11;76:e3286.

Finsterer J. Guillain-Barre syndrome 15 days after COVID-19 despite SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. IDCases. 2021 Jul 12; 25:e01226.

Finsterer J. Neurological side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021. doi: 10.1111/ane.13550.

Kaulen LD et al, Neurological autoimmune diseases following vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2: a case series. Eur J Neurol. 2021. doi: 10.1111/ene.15147.

[107] Sharma A et al, Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Reports Medicine. 2020; 1(4): 100052.

Shi S et al, Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5(7):802-10.

Chen L et al, The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020; 116:1097–1100.

Tucker NR et al, Myocyte Specific Upregulation of ACE2 in Cardiovascular Disease: Implications for SARS-CoV-2 mediated myocarditis. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 2020.04.09.20059204.

Oudit GY et al, SARS-coronavirus modulation of myocardial ACE2 expression and inflammation in patients with SARS. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2009; 39:618–625.

Tricarico G, Travagli V, COVID-19 fatal outcomes: Role of the endothelial glycocalyx in both cell adhesion and migration. Biomed J. 2021; 44(4):512–513.

Giardini V et al, Increased sFLT-1/PlGF ratio in COVID-19: A novel link to angiotensin II-mediated endothelial dysfunction. AJH. 2020; 95(8):25882. 

Østergaard L, SARS CoV-2 related microvascular damage and symptoms during and after COVID-19: Consequences of capillary transit-time changes, tissue hypoxia and inflammation. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14726

Choi S et al, Myocarditis-induced sudden death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Korea: case report focusing on histopathological findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(40):e286.

Dionne A et al, Association of Myocarditis with BNT162b2 Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Case Series of Children. JAMA Cardiol. 2021:e213471

Kim HW et a, Patients with Acute Myocarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination. JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6(10):1196-1201. 

Montgomery J et al, Myocarditis Following Immunization With mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military. JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6(10):1202-6

Das BB et al, Myopericarditis after messenger RNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Adolescents 12 to 18 Years of Age. J Pediatr. 2021; 238:26-32.e1.

Kafil T, Crean A et al, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and development of CMR-confirmed myopericarditis. Doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.13.21262182.

[108] Tricarico G et al, Clinical Evidence and Therapeutic Treatments at the Time of the Coronaviruses Responsible for SARS: A Perspective and Points of view with a Focus on Vascular Endothelium. Coronaviruses, 2021, 2, e130921191743.

Gundry S, Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS: a Warning. Circulation, 2021; 144:A10712.

Sangli S et al, Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia After the Messenger RNA–1273 Vaccine. Ann Intern Med. 2021: L21-0244.

Carli G et al, Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurring shortly after the second dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Intern Emerg Med. 2021; doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02685-0 

Andraska EA et al, Three cases of acute venous thromboembolism in females after vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.07.009 

Shazley O et al, A COVID-Positive 52-Year-Old Man Presented With Venous Thromboembolism and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Following Johnson & Johnson Vaccination: A Case-Study. Cureus. 2021 Jul 14;13(7):e16383

Hippisley-Cox J et al, Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study. BMJ. 2021; 374:n1931.

[109] Lei Y, Zhang J et al, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein impairs endothelial function via downregulation of ACE2. Circulation Research. 2021; 128(9):1323-6.

[110]  Colunga Biancatelli RML et al, The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit S1 induces COVID-19-like acute lung injury in Κ18-hACE2 transgenic mice and barrier dysfunction in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2021; 321(2):477-84.

[111] Olajide OA et al, Induction of Exaggerated Cytokine Production in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells by a Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein S1 and Its Inhibition by Dexamethasone. Inflammation. 2021; 44:1865-77.

[112] https://www.vocidallastrada.org/2021/10/eudravigilance-27247-morti-2563768.html

[113] Polack FP et al, Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:2603-15.

[114] Walter EB et al, Evaluation of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116298.

[115] Baden LR et al, Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, N Engl J Med. 2021; 384:403-16.

December 17, 2021

Video: There is no “These United States of America” anymore. It’s time to admit that and get to work dividing her accordingly…..NOW!

Joe Rogan and Dr. Peter McCullough MD, MPH were in a three hour podcast on Spotify. Here are “highlights”:

  • No American hospital system will treat Covid patients except for last-ditch procedures like ventilators.  Not even Harvard, UCLA or Mayo has a treatment protocol for Covid since all medicines that work, like Hydroxychloroquine, are forbidden due to political resistance.
  • Moderna was working on the “vaccine” before the virus was discovered.
  • Within its first year, the “vaccine” has killed about 45,000 Americans. About half of them died within 48 hours of the jab; 80% within a week. In 86% of these cases, there was no significant co-morbidities except age.
  • One official study found that 38% of Covid-positive cases were transmitted vaccinated-to-vaccinated. (Read this one again, slowly, if you still don’t get what’s going on here.)
  • He proves this was a “planned mass psychosis” by going through the stages required to lead the majority of a population into irrational fear.
  • 0% of the US COVID deaths were treated with adequate pre-hospitalization care like Ivermectin.
  • Ivermectin is now first-line medicine for Covid diagnoses in Japan and has flattened the curve in Peru, Mexico and parts of India.
  • Note that I disagree with his promotion of Monoclonal Antibodies since LifeSite News reports these “are made from/tested on fetal cells and risk ‘serious side effects.’”
  • All life-saving medicines were suppressed in order to roll out the “vaccine” and this was only able to be executed by using “planned mass psychosis” of fear.  McCullough proves this in many ways, one of which is how the CNN death tolls were allegedly in real-time, where as he, as a cardiologist and masters of public health, insists that death certificates are usually issued 6 weeks post-mortem.
  • The desired end of this global mass-psychosis (with the (mis)use of the existence of the virus and the “vaccines”) is a global net-loss of life.

Link: 30 Facts You Need to Know –  Your Covid Cribsheet.

Video: The Elon Musk Effect. Is the Great Reset Going Senile?

S.O.S. From Australia

I feel sorrow for those in the northern territories of Australia.
I live in the USA and my country is not far behind in enacting the same tyranny.

December 2, 2021

If your children reject all that you believe, you have only yourself to blame.

Overcoming Covid Psychosis
Patrick Coffin’s interview with Dr. Mark McDonald

November 29, 2021

This video will tell you EXACTLY what the filthy rich think of you and what they want for you.


Here is the Direct link to the video on BitChute by Dave Cullen.

Note who is smiling and who is not; who has his face fully revealed and who does not.

November 28, 2021

The War on Humanity – Updated Video Link

Timeline Video of the PLAN-demic

The greatest sign of tyranny is when even questioning is forbidden. It makes you wonder WHY they are SOOOO insecure, so unable to be confronted about their force-it-down-our-throats narrative. What is their true agenda? It sure as hell has NOTHING to do with ridding the world of “mis-information” since they, themselves, are the ultimate culprit of it. I am leaving up the below blocked-video message – and adding a link to where the video CAN be viewed – just to remind you that that YouTube, Twitter, FaceBook, Microsoft, Google, Instagram, and many other hateful, arrogant, filthy rich control-freak madmen do not give a damn about informing you and allowing you to decide for yourself the fate of you own life, but only with indoctrinating you, corrupting you and, frankly, killing you. In their mind “The less the merrier” when it comes to the world’s population.

The video CAN be viewed at the below link. It’s time to ditch YouTube. Remember; every time you watch an ad on YouTube THEY are making money off of you. Money is what they ultimately love – deciding every micro-second of your life – and exterminating you off the face of the planet, if they so wish – are a close second. Want to aid in effecting change? Deprive them of their god – MONEY!

Click here for THE WAR ON HUMANITY video

YouTube elitist billionaires honestly feel that I am cattle and only worthy of being treated as their fodder. THEY will not decide what I hear, read, think, believe, do, feel or learn. I WILL DECIDE!!!

See link above to view the video and flip-off YouTube.

Covid Jab is meant to Cull the Population

Click Above for Video by Dr Vernon Coleman on Brand New Tube

Scientists on leashes like dogs. We are next.

November 17, 2021

How the ‘metaverse’ will create a virtual Hell on Earth

Such a lonely world disconnected from reality and the nature of things can feed the unfettered passions that hate all moral restraint. A space like this can quickly go from Alice in Wonderland to insane asylum…

It will make possible immoral acts that will gravely offend God…

The metaverse must be understood in the context of a process of modernity’s continuous effort to put humanity, not God, at the center of all things…

THIS is the priority of unelected President Biden?

Unmasking Fauci – Coffin Interview with Kennedy

November 11, 2021

Excuse the long pause in my posts

I have been working on trying to educate the residents, especially parents, of the coming “New Order” aka modern slavery. Alas, it is virtually impossible to overcome purposeful ignorance caused by apathy and laziness, even when overcoming that blindness would save the lives of their children. I feel frustrated almost to the point of despair. I have done a lot of research about many, many matters, and ironically, by doing so, I have found, time after time, it is only about 3% of any population who choose the “red pill”. Only 3%. I try to remind myself that only 3% of the residents of what would be become these United States of America actually fought in the Revolutionary War – and won it – with the remainder riding on the courage and deaths of those of who cared enough about their freedom to fight for it.

Freedom is NOT free.

Anyone who lives in a land of the free does so because of the brave.

To the depth of my being, I wish to abandon to the fate of utter poverty and slavery those who refuse to even stand up for the smallest of rights; unfortunately, they will drag me down with them if only from jealously of my courage and because misery does indeed love company. They will be and will deserve to be miserable…..

and yet, they will still DO nothing!

Watch THIS video by Computing Forever on BitChute and learn how “vaccination” = “sterilization

God have mercy on the U.S.A

Go AWAY Brandon!

October 24, 2021

Will We Even Find A Lump Of Banned Coal In Christmas Stockings?

(Excerpt) From the very day Biden took office last January, he intentionally began this nation’s destruction. He started reversing Donald Trump’s successful energy policies so that the U.S. and its people became beggars, suffering debilities and higher costs all along supply chains.

To read the entire article, and, I assure you, you do, click HERE

The current regime, Democrats in general, Leftists, Corporations, Big Pharma, Social Tech Oligarchs and most petty Authoritarians find it easy, justifiable and glorious to spend other people’s money, knowing full well that doing so will never, and was never even meant to, benefit those from whom the money was taken – taken against their will.

October 23, 2021 (Supplement)

Want a synopsis of all the crap the government is intentionally putting you through, and how and why they are doing so?

Then watch THIS video!

Even Black Lives Matter Has Had Enough

Michael Matt explains how the Build Back Better sabotage of America is directly impacting deliveries and construction work on the new RTV studio project.  Lumber, supplies, even food is in short supply all across the country, as some 70 cargo ships off the coast of California are not allowed to unload their cargo. 

What’s going on?

Michael argues that we’re witnessing the intentionally orchestrated collapse the U.S. economy, which includes wrecking small business (because it provides independence from government), paying Americans not to work, opening the borders and — last but not least — putting a total buffoon in the Oval Office.

If they’re going to “build back better,” our globalist friends first have to destroy everything in this country…including the once greatest healthcare system in the world.  If you don’t think this is intentional, you need to watch this video.

Tell that to the average middle-class family who is seeing the greatest and most rapid increase in food and gas prices in decades. But, hey; none of that affects the lives of those who are causing it to occur because they ARE upper-class and therefore WEALTHY! Still think they give a damn about your life, this country or “the common good”?
Wrong! They are doing what is best for themselves, ONLY.
As always, thank Biden voters for the additional 20-25% you are now paying for the food you put in your children’s mouths and the gas you use to get to work…..that is if you are not leaching off of the middle-class by taking government money!!

October 23, 2021

We Have Lost Many of Our Constitutional Rights Already!

Freedom of Religion. Only if you follow the Religion of Public Health. Pastors, Priests, and Rabbis bowed down to the false god of government when tyrannical governors prohibited or limited in person religious events.

Free Speech. Not anymore. Controlled and censored speech is the order of the day. Critical thinking is mocked. Doctors are threatened by the medical establishment for asking scientific questions about COVID early treatments and vaccine related illnesses.

Free Press. Wiped out. Five corporations control 90% of America’s news outlets: Comcast, Disney, Viacom/CBS, News Corp, and AT&T. The official narrative is parroted verbatim and incessantly. Just like China. Just like North Korea. It is no wonder a recent Rasmussen poll found that over 60% of the American people view the press as: “The Enemy of the People.”

Freedom of Assembly. The government is threatening organizations who don’t “social distance,” who refuse to wear a mask, and who won’t abide by limits on the number of people who can attend rallies-groups like America’s Frontline Doctors.

Freedom to Petition the Government. I am, for all practical purposes, under house arrest with no formal charges brought against me. Why? Because I petitioned my government—and now I have lost my Constitutional rights. And I am not alone.

Right to bodily integrity. This is essentially gone, through coercive tactics to force Americans to accept an experimental treatment they don’t want and don’t need.

Due process. Don’t get me started. There are good people, Americans who are languishing in jail as I write you – pretrial – based upon accusations only!

Speedy and Public Trial. Gone. No longer will the US government promise to give us our day in court, much less before a jury of our peers for all to see. So-called secret courts.

Trial by Jury. Due to lockdowns, the accused are held without a trial by jury for weeks or months.

I always thought I lived in the United States of America, not in some communist dictatorship.

And what are the excuses for erasing our Constitution? Medical safety, economic security, and religious duty. But we cannot afford to overlook the underlying theme to all three: TYRANNY.

The reason the communists decided to use medical tyranny is because it is the most effective: it is silent, secret, and insidious. It causes great fear, cowardice, and a hyper-reliance on authority. It also distracts people from the REAL enemy: the tyrannical overlords who seek to divide us.

The tyrannical overlords pit black against white, male against female, rich against poor. Vaxxed vs. normal is just another exploitable division.

Our work, our mission, is reclaiming our Constitutional liberties by blocking those who intend you to live under tyranny.

The World Health Organization, the FDA, the NIH, and the CDC are proven liars who have lost all credibility and common-sense, while jeopardizing YOUR health and safety.

What disgusts me most is how their failed prescriptions have exposed the most vulnerable: our elderly and our children.

The New York Times, CNN, NPR, and hundreds of other news outlets have censored the truth in order to preserve their power. Twitter, Facebook, Google/YouTube, Apple, and dozens of other Tech companies are throttling down content, suppressing information, and de-platforming those with whom they disagree.

And the White House, by pitting the vaxxed against the un-vaxxed, has created a scenario whereby they are imposing their imperialism and decrees on BOTH groups.

This is madness, and it must stop.

Benjamin Rush said, “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of this republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom.”

It begins with you and me. For Liberty.

Dr. Simone Gold, Founder
America’s Frontline Doctors

You CANNOT comply your way out of tyranny. Compliance only empowers tyrants to exert even more control by tearing away more of your rights, and increasing punishment for non-compliance, because you think “Well, it’s not THAT much worse”. Power stolen is never voluntarily relinquished; It has to be ripped away from those who abused their position by taking what they never deserved and were never permitted to have. If they demand a mile and you think that if they “compromise” and only take a yard, do you feel relieved? If yes, you are a blind, mindless drone. What stops them from taking yard after yard until they get the full mile in the end anyways? It may take longer, but you will still be enslaved. A frog in water slowly brought to a boil is still as cooked as one who is flash-boiled.

Who is suppose to serve who? The government serve the people? Or the people serve the government? Reflect on your actions and you will know who you feel should serve who. If/when there is another useless lockdown, mask mandate, or vaccine, when you obey out of fear or out of the hope for a return to previous autonomy when all evidence indicates the opposite, who are you trusting? Who are you worshipping? Who has the final say over your life? To whom are you bowing? Your choices are to either act like a spineless, docile, tit-sucking slave who relies on his or her “master” to make all of one’s decisions or like someone who knows that the worst is yet to come if you do not rebel and say “Stop! NO! WE tell YOU how we wish to be governed. You don’t get to tell us how to live our lives. I, alone, will be forced to deal with the consequences of decisions affecting my life, whether those decisions are made by you or me. There is no downside for you. For me, the probable downside of allowing you to act as my sole authority under whom I must receive permission to even take my next breath is the loss of my God-given freedoms, my inability to pursue happiness, and even the preservation of my life!”

You cannot believe in and bow to the government/media/social tech/corporations/”experts” who now act, together, as a single-minded entity with shared nefarious goals, and believe in and bow to the Creator of all, the omnipotent and never-changing God. They are 180 degrees apart from each other nearly 100% of the time, now. When you bow to the demands of a mere human being when they contradict the commands of God, you point your head at the authority of mankind, but your ass at the authority of God. And many wonder why Jesus said in scripture that most persons are damned.

Matthew 7:13-14

13 Enter through the narrow gate, for the gate is wide and the road broad that leads to destruction, and those who enter through it are many. 14 But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and those who find it are few in number.

October 21, 2021 (Supplement)

We are past rationality: Firm resistance is needed to stop the purge of the unjabbed

Oct 21, 2021 (Mercola) – So, the Great New Normal Purge has begun … right on cue, right by the numbers. As we “paranoid conspiracy theorists” have been warning would happen for the past 18 months, people who refuse to convert to the new official ideology are now being segregated, stripped of their jobs, banned from attending schools, denied medical treatment, and otherwise persecuted.

Relentless official propaganda demonizing “the Unvaccinated” is being pumped out by the corporate and state media, government leaders, health officials, and shrieking fanatics on social media. “The Unvaccinated” are the new official “Untermenschen,” an underclass of subhuman “others” the New Normal masses are being conditioned to hate.

But it isn’t just a purge of “the Unvaccinated.” Anyone deviating from the official ideology is being systematically demonized and persecuted.

In Germany, Australia, and other New Normal countries, protesting the New Normal is officially outlawed. The New Normal Gestapo is going around to people’s homes to interrogate them about their anti-New Normal Facebook posts. Corporations are openly censoring content that contradicts the official narrative. New Normal goon squads roam the streets, checking people’s “vaccination” papers.

And it’s not just governments and corporations carrying out the New Normal Purge. Friends are purging friends. Wives are purging husbands. Fathers are purging children. Children are purging parents. New Normals are purging old normal thoughts. Global “health authorities” are revising definitions to make them conform to New Normal “science.”

And so on … a new official “reality” is being manufactured, right before our eyes. Anything and anyone that doesn’t conform to it is being purged, unpersoned, memory-holed, erased. None of which should come as a surprise.

Every nascent totalitarian system, at some stage of its takeover of society, launches a purge of political opponents, ideological dissidents, and other “anti-social deviants.” Such purges can be brief or open-ended, and they can take any number of outward forms, depending on the type of totalitarian system, but you cannot have totalitarianism without them.

The essence of totalitarianism — regardless of which costumes and ideology it wears — is a desire to completely control society, every aspect of society, every individual behavior and thought.

Every totalitarian system, whether an entire nation, a tiny cult, or any other form of social body, evolves toward this unachievable goal … the total ideological transformation and control of every single element of society (or whatever type of social body it comprises). This fanatical pursuit of total control, absolute ideological uniformity, and the elimination of all dissent is what makes totalitarianism totalitarianism.

Thus, each new totalitarian system, at some point in its evolution, needs to launch a purge of those who refuse to conform to its official ideology. It needs to do this for two basic reasons: (1) to segregate or otherwise eliminate actual political opponents and dissidents who pose a threat to the new regime; and (2) and more importantly, to establish the ideological territory within which the masses must now confine themselves in order to avoid being segregated, or eliminated.

The purge must be conducted openly, brutally, so that the masses understand that the rules of society have changed, forever, that their former rights and freedoms are gone, and that from now on any type of resistance or deviation from official ideology will not be tolerated, and will be ruthlessly punished.

The purge is usually launched during a “state of emergency,” under imminent threat from some official “enemy” (e.g., “communist infiltrators,” “counter-revolutionaries,” or … you know, a “devastating pandemic”), such that the normal rules of society can be indefinitely suspended “for the sake of survival.”

The more terrified the masses can be made, the more willing they will be to surrender their freedom and follow orders, no matter how insane.

The lifeblood of totalitarianism is fear … fear of both the system’s official enemy (which is constantly stoked with propaganda) and of the totalitarian system itself. That the brutality of the system is rationalized by the threat posed by the official enemy doesn’t make it any less brutal or terrifying. Under totalitarian systems (of any type or scale) fear is a constant and there is no escape from it.

The masses’ fear is then channeled into hatred … hatred of the official “Untermenschen,” whom the system encourages the masses to scapegoat. Thus, the purge is also a means of allowing the masses to purge themselves of their fear, to transform it into self-righteous hatred and unleash it on the “Untermenschen” instead of the totalitarian system, which, obviously, would be suicidal.

Every totalitarian system — both the individuals running it and the system, structurally — instinctively understands how all this works. New Normal totalitarianism is no exception. Just reflect on what has happened over the last 18 months.

Day after day, month after month, the masses have been subjected to the most destructive psychological-terror campaign in the history of psychological terror. Sadly, many of them have been reduced to paranoid, anus-puckering invalids, afraid of the outdoors, of human contact, afraid of their own children, afraid of the air, morbidly obsessed with disease and death … and consumed with hatred of “the Unvaccinated.”

Their hatred, of course, is utterly irrational, the product of fear and propaganda, as hatred of “the Untermenschen” always is. It has absolutely nothing to do with a virus, which even the New Normal authorities admit. “The Unvaccinated” are no more of a threat to anyone than any other human being … except insofar as they threaten the New Normals’ belief in their delusional ideology.

No, we are way past rationality at this point. We are witnessing the birth of a new form of totalitarianism. Not “communism.” Not “fascism.” Global-capitalist totalitarianism. Pseudo-medical totalitarianism. Pathologized totalitarianism. A form of totalitarianism without a dictator, without a definable ideology. A totalitarianism based on “science,” on “fact,” on “reality,” which it creates itself.

I don’t know about you, but, so far, it has certainly made quite an impression on me. So much so that I have mostly set aside my satirical schtick to try to understand it … what it actually is, why it is happening, why it is happening now, where it is going, and how to oppose it, or at least disrupt it.

The way I see it, the next six months will determine how successful the initial stages of the roll-out of this new totalitarianism will be. By April of 2022, either we’ll all be showing our “papers” to the New Normal Gestapo to be able to earn a living, attend a school, dine at a restaurant, travel, and otherwise live our lives, or we will have thrown a monkey wrench into the machinery.

I do not expect GloboCap to abandon the roll-out of the New Normal over the longer term — they are clearly committed to implementing it — but we have the power to ruin their opening act (which they’ve been planning and rehearsing for quite some time).

So, let’s go ahead and do that, shall we? Before we get purged, or unpersoned, or whatever. I’m not sure, as I haven’t seen a “fact-check” yet, but I believe there are some commercial airline pilots in the USA who are showing us the way.

By CJ Hopkins

October 21, 2021

Where are our Children?

The above video is not a moral stance, but one of knowledge. It is imperative that you acknowledge that you, alone, are responsible for your actions and not claim innocence through purposeful ignorance. No one respects someone who says that he or she didn’t know when, in today’s world, it takes about 5 seconds to find the information on the internet and only a few minutes to begin to learn it. You cannot make good decisions based on lack of or faulty information; but if you go ahead with a decision that has life-changing consequences, without your due-diligence, and you or someone else suffers as a result, it is your own fault – don’t point your finger at another person and try to pass the blame. It is up to you to care enough about yourself and those around you to do a modicum of research. When you know more, you will make better decisions and, in the end, you will be happier and more in-line with life.

Don’t be fooled by claims of ‘consensus’ on climate change, science is not a popularity contest

Oct 21, 2021 (American Thinker) — A new “peer-reviewed” paper has been released from Cornell University titled “Greater than 99% Consensus on Human Caused Climate Change in the Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature.” 

The study is yet another attempt to convey the nebulous notion that widespread scientific consensus exists regarding the primary causal factor behind climate change.

A previous study, spearheaded by climate blogger activist John Cook, concluded in 2013 there was “97 percent consensus.” Despite near-universal acclaim and its citation by leading policymakers such as the United Kingdom’s energy minister, the study was inherently flawed. 

Dr. Mike Hulme of the University of East Anglia explains, “The ‘97% consensus’ article is poorly conceived, poorly designed, and poorly executed. It obscures the complexities of the climate issue, and it is a sign of the desperately poor level of public and policy debate in this country [UK] that the energy minister should cite it.” 

Even the Guardian  – typically a stalwart supporter of climate activism – ran a headline stating: “The claim of a 97% consensus on global warming does not stand up.” 

After a thorough analysis, more than 100 published articles shredded the study’s faulty methodology and completely rejected its postulated consensus level of 97 percent  

Yet, Cook’s baseless study was still used as the inspiration for today’s release from Cornell – which, unsurprisingly, is similarly flawed. Regarding the researchers’ methodological approach, the article’s press release states, “In the study, the researchers began by examining a random sample of 3,000 studies from the dataset of 88,125 English-language climate papers published between 2012 and 2020.” 

There are many issues with this approach, the primary concern being selection bias. The authors arbitrarily decide to look at just an eight-year range of climate papers, neglecting to examine the large number of papers published before 2012. This approach, therefore, conveniently “forgets” to incorporate the significant sample of climate-skeptical papers written in response to the then-nascent concept of global warming in the 1970s. 

They go on to say “case closed,” even as the glaring bias of pre-selection ensures many skeptical papers from the 1970s, when global warming first appeared on the radar of science, to today, were excluded from the study

Primary paper author Mark Lynas, a visiting fellow with Cornell’s Alliance for Science, concludes: “We are virtually certain that the consensus is well over 99% now, and that it’s pretty much case closed for any meaningful public conversation about the reality of human-caused climate change.” 

To cast further shadow upon the study’s conclusions beyond the glaring selection bias problem, Lynas himself inspires reason for distrust. The lead author has a history of climate activism. 

Danish author Bjørn Lomborg, a former member of Greenpeace, penned a book titled The Skeptical Environmentalist. In that book, Lomborg suggested pragmatic solutions to climate issues. At a book signing in 2001 in Oxford, England, Lynas was caught on video throwing a pie in the face of Lomborg, who was simply attempting to establish good scientific procedure. Rather than attempting to rationally object like an academic is expected to do, Lynas resorted to personal assault.  

To further confound the aforementioned issues with the study and its authors, the entire focus of the study is based on the flawed premise that consensus matters or should even be sought. 

Dr. Richard Tol effectively summarizes this problem in his rebuke of this study’s conclusions, claiming, “Consensus is irrelevant in science. There are plenty of examples in history where everyone agreed, and everyone was wrong.” 

Indeed, there are many such examples. Consensus does not require truth or accuracy; it merely establishes that a group of any number of individuals congregated and agreed to a certain perspective – which is often based on nothing but misinformed opinions. 

Author Alex Alexander explains this sociological phenomenon in his article, “When Consensus is a Bad Way to Decide.” “Consensus is about persuasion and compromise, not right or wrong, not what works best. Consensus is about human interactions, which are mainly about emotions, jumping to conclusions, and negotiation, and may or may not include facts and analysis. Consensus is about compromise, and compromise means that someone, maybe everyone, has to set aside an idea that may have value in order to satisfy the group, or the leader of the group.” 

Even world-renowned physicist Albert Einstein recognized the fallacy of consensus when it is applied to science. When the Nazi Party of Germany decided they didn’t like Einstein because he was Jewish, they set about to discredit him by publishing One Hundred Authors Against Einstein in 1931. In total, 121 authors were identified as opponents to Einstein’s special relativity theory. 

Einstein, one step ahead of them all, is said to have riposted, “It would not have required one hundred authors to prove me wrong; one would have been enough.” 

This is the essence of science – it only takes one author employing sound scientific experimentation to provide effective evidence in support of a theory or hypothesis. Needless to say, this is not how Lynas and many of his peers have historically operated. 

So, when Lynas asserts that the case is closed, he has provided little to no valid evidence in support of his theory. More methodologically sound forays into predicting the effects of global warming have been attempted, but their results range everywhere from “little effect” to apocalyptic scenarios. It simply depends on the scientist, the specific question being asked, and the methodology employed to test that question. 

Science cannot necessarily provide us with a fool proof answer to the exact effects that global warming may have on our planet, but one thing is certain: science is not a popularity contest. The study released today only further cements that consensus is completely meaningless as a means of establishing proof. 

By Anthony Watts

If it suits the globalists’ agenda, then you know it’s a lie.

October 20, 2021


Sexually Explicit Material Found in Children’s School Library

October 15, 2021 (Epoch Times) – A North Carolina parent cited state law in pointing the Wake County School Board to possible felonious, sexually explicit material found in one of its libraries.

Chad Slotta told the board in its Oct. 5 meeting that one of his children found the book, “Lawn Boy” by Jonathan Evison in the school’s library.

The book, Slotta said, describes illicit sex between minors, a 10-year-old who engages in a sex act during a church youth group behind a church parsonage, sexually explicit language, and allusions to bestiality.

Now I feel grieved and embarrassed to even discuss this issue in a public forum, but in the defense of innocence and decency of not only my child but the classmates, I can’t remain silent,” Slotta told the board during public comment.

It’s unacceptable that an adult trusted to educate children, “either knowingly or through ignorance,” would permit the dissemination of objectively obscene material to children, Slotta said.

Slotta later read from NC General Statute 14-190.1, which states that it’s a class-one felony for a “person, firm, or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity” that depicts or describes in a “patently offensive way” sexual conduct that could be directed at children as a potential audience.

‘At Best, Broken; At Worst, Corrupt’

Slotta asked the board to initiate a “thorough and transparent” review of the books currently available and the process by which they are chosen.

The process by which books and material are added to our school libraries is at best broken, and at worst, corrupt,” Slotta said. “It’s broken if an elected or unelected person or committee failed to properly vet this book and others like it from coming into the school. The process is corrupt if an elected or unelected official or committee vetted the book and others like it and thought, ‘Hey, this would add value to our children,’ then sourced them intentionally in our schools.”

Slotta later told The Epoch Times that as he’s watched the brewing controversy of sexualized material being found in K-12 school systems across the country, he’s identified several other titles in his child’s online school library.

I didn’t want to transfer a national narrative on our local situation unless those things were actually happening here,” Slotta said. “Unfortunately, we discovered that in fact books we saw being reported on and others, which in our opinion are more obscene and more graphic, were in the library where our child attends school.”

Other books he named were “Out of Darkness,” by Ashley Hope Perez, in which he said there are multiple sexual descriptions, one of which being a group of boys fantasizing about group sex; and “All Boys Aren’t Blue,” by George M. Johnson, in which he said there are vivid details about sexual acts.

Slotta didn’t name the specific school his child attends because, he said, his goal is not to get anyone fired, but to effect change by initiating the review that would question the legality of the material within the context of a K-12 scholastic setting.

In response to Slotta’s concerns, a Wake County board member forwarded Slotta a written policy by which parents can request a review and removal of certain material.

What the board member didn’t get back to me on was the process by which these are added to the media center,” he said. “I suspect that’s going to be more of a challenge for them to respond to just given the nature of those materials, but that will be a major emphasis of our inquiry going forward.”

Appropriate Discernment

Within the school setting, Slotta said “sexuality” and “biology” should be discerned.

We send our kids to school to be taught science and mathematics, and a part of that discipline of science includes anatomy and biology, but when it comes to human sexuality, which to me is a very different discipline, I think that belongs at home with the parents, not in the schools with the teachers,” Slotta said.

When reached for comment, the Wake County Public School System’s (WCPS) communication director sent The Epoch Times the WCPS’ policy on the parent’s right to inspect materials and submit an objection.

If the committee determines that any material violates constitutional or other legal rights of the parent or student, the principal or the committee shall either remove the material from instructional use or accommodate the student or parent,” the policy states.

F.A.C.T.S. Task Force

Earlier this year, Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, a Republican, had enacted the F.A.C.T.S. (Fairness and Accountability in the Classroom for Teachers and Students) task force to provide an online portal through which teachers and students can submit examples of critical race theory (CRT) in the North Carolina school systems.

CRT is based on the Marxist philosophy that describes society as a class struggle between oppressors and the oppressed; it labels white people as the oppressors and all other races as the oppressed.

In the report, themes of race shaming, sexualization of children, allusions to surgical castration in children’s literature, and accusations of xenophobia against political figures surfaced.

Democrats, including Gov. Roy Cooper, have said that the allegations of CRT being taught in schools is “conspiracy-laden politics.”

Cooper later vetoed a bill that would have prohibited teachings that promote concepts that are contrary to “equality and rights of all persons.”

This week, Robinson faced criticism over comments he made in a church while being filmed.

The video was posted on Twitter by a group called Right Wing Watch.

In referring to homosexuality and transgenderism, Robinson said these issues “have no place in school.”

There’s no reason anybody anywhere in America should be telling a child about transgenderism, homosexuality, any of that filth, and yes I called it filth,” Robinson said.

The White House and North Carolina politicians, including Gov. Cooper and Attorney General Josh Stein, condemned Robinson, and various LGBT groups called for his resignation, to which Robinson later said he wouldn’t “back down.”

In a press conference on Oct. 12, Robinson said that by “filth,” he was referring to the material, not the LGBT community.

The narrative that’s been driven that I have something against the LGBT community is absolutely false,” Robinson said.

American is not a theocracy, he added.

I don’t have the right to tell anyone how they live their personal lives,” Robinson said.

Though he may disagree with one’s lifestyle on a “personal and spiritual level,” he said it’s his job to protect people’s rights.

Robinson then said the question around the material being found in schools is a legal issue.

You can look at this and clearly see that this is quite possibly, probably is child pornography being presented to our children,” he said, referencing images he had displayed beside him from the book “Gender Queer: A Memoir,” by Maia Kobabe, which depicted explicit sexual acts.

Both “Gender Queer” and “Lawn Boy” were pulled from The Fairfax Public School system in Virginia after a parent spoke out against the books at a school board meeting.

When asked in what school systems the book was found, Robinson’s director of communication said it “came to our office’s attention from Cedar Ridge High School in Hillsborough, North Carolina. However, we know that it is in at least six counties: Buncombe, Durham, Gaston, Mecklenburg, Orange, and Wake.”

By Matt McGregor

October 19, 2021

The Coming Ecological Dictatorship

‘These courtesans of power, whom no one has elected and who owe their appointment to the globalist elite that uses them as cynical executors of their orders, have since 2017 declared in no uncertain terms the society that they want to achieve.’

Click HERE to read entire transcription of video speech by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’ on Oct 15, 2021

Don’t be fooled; Even if you do not see see an increase in Federal or State income or property taxes, you are still receiving a tax increase through the increase in the price of gasoline, utilities, food, and all consumer goods and services. If you pay 25% more for an item that is taxable, then the government is receiving 25% more tax revenue from you. Even if the item is not taxable to you, the business pays taxes on the item’s increase in profit (or should, at least) and so the government still receives an increase in tax revenue. And that is money that is no longer in your wallet or bank account for you to use as you see fit. To the government, YOUR money is THEIR money that they are graciously allowing you to decide how to spend on goods and services (or ungraciously forcing you to fork over in taxes)…..allowing, mind you…..at least for now.,,,,until they decide otherwise.

October 18, 2021

Vaccine mandates have absolutely nothing to do with medical realities

(Excerpt transcription) Berenson told Rogan the number of fully vaccinated people dying from COVID is rising, according to data in most countries. He pointed to what he claims is the best national data available, data from Israel and the U.K. “The best data we have comes out of the U.K. and Israel,” Berenson said. “And in the U.K., at least 70% of the people who died from COVID in August were fully vaccinated, and that’s straight from British government documents.” Berenson said Israel, which began vaccinating earlier than any other country, mandated a third, booster shot because data showed fully vaccinated people were losing their immunity and dying from COVID. Berenson said the third shot “drives up protection in the short term, but we don’t know what the consequences of a third shot in the long term.

Co-Inventor of the mRNA Vaccine Technology

The COVID-19 gene-altering treatment wanes 40% each month. If you haven’t taken the jab, don’t ever do so. If you have, don’t get the booster. The risks far outweigh any supposed benefits

October 15, 2021

‘Fully vaccinated’ 21-year-old personal trainer dies from COVID complications

Shawn Kuhn, a senior at UGA majoring in exercise and sports science, died on October 11 following complications involving the novel coronavirus.

Oct 14, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – (Excerpt) The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded a staggering 778,685 injury reports following injection with a COVID shot from December 14, 2020, to October 1, 2021. Of this number, 597 have been deaths in people 44 years of age and under and 5,469 have been of permanent disabilities within the same age group.

The 17–44 age group represented the second largest group of people who were hospitalized and to have a life-threatening development after taking the shot. These figures, however, are based on voluntary reports to VAERS, and the Harvard Pilgrim study found that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events” are reported to VAERS.

By David McLoone

Click HERE to read entire article

October 14, 2021 (Supplement)

Planned Parenthood is teaching your MIDDLE-SCHOOL kids sex-ethics and encouraging them to lie to you.

Planned Parenthood recently distributed flyers at ­Stewart Middle School in Tacoma, Washington. The flyers targeted eleven-­year-olds, informing them that they could have sex with anyone under the age of thirteen, and that their parents were not ­entitled to determine whether they took birth control or were tested for sexually transmitted diseases. The kids could make up their own minds.

Click HERE to read entire article

October 14, 2021

Rules don’t apply to unaccountable, corrupt Fauci, FDA and CDC

In this video interview (See link HERE or below), Dr. Robert Malone , a collaborator on the mRNA vaccine, discusses everything from his professional career, the current state of politics and the medical research industry, and the real science behind the coronavirus “vaccine”.


Pfizer whistleblower says vaccine glows

In this video interview (See link HERE or below), Melissa Strickler, a Christian, recently went public with insider emails showing Pfizer executives wanted to hide the vaccine’s connection to aborted-fetal cells, and that the company’s jab includes toxic chemicals that make it ‘glow’, including luciferase and graphene oxide.


NO !!!
NO !!!

NO !!!

Say “NO’ to all of the above! Unless you are morbidly obese, immuno-compromised or over 70 years old, not only are they useless, they are actually harmful, especially for children! If you subject your children to any of the above, you are not only ignorant – at the cost of your children’s physical, mental, and emotional health – but you are bowing down to anti-God entities that would like to see you dead. 3rd World countries are being given early-treatment options for COVID-19 which have drastically reduced illness and hospitalizations, but, NOT 1st World countries like the U.S. Why? Because the latter are less controllable than the former and would make lousy slaves. Prove to them not only that you would be a lousy slave but that you are “Mad as hell and won’t take it anymore”!

October 13, 2021

Patriots can and must combat the virus of leftism to prevent global communism

Although the Leftist pathogen cannot be eradicated, it is treatable by sane and responsible measures, especially through personal courage and a phalanx of patriots who will not be intimidated and who will not allow the Constitution to be trampled on.

Oct 12, 2021 (PJ Media) – We have suffered through a year and a half of a viral pandemic, which has become for a majority of us the Alpha and Omega of everyday life. We think of little else and organize our lives around media-inflamed anxiety, ever-changing medical reports, and government ordinances.

We wear masks. We put distance between ourselves and our fellows. We isolate. We line up for what seems like a never-ending succession of jabs. We devour the news as if it were the truth. We are victims of what is called “fear appeal,” defined as “a persuasive message that attempts to arouse fear in order to divert behavior through the threat of impending danger or harm.”

Yet, in our addiction to the doctrine and apparatus of the COVID industry, far too many of us have missed the big picture. “Maybe there is something darker and more nefarious at work,” remarks Jeffrey Tucker in Liberty or Lockdown.

For there is indeed a pandemic that has spread its pathogens across the world and afflicted the West with a disease from which it may not recover, a kind of viral contagion from which there may be no immediate or even long-term escape. We are confronting a curve that may not be flattened in the foreseeable future.

It is a political disease for which we have many names — progressivism, Wokeism, Agenda 2030, the Great Reset, etc. — but they are all subsumed under the aegis of the Left, which approaches in stages or “waves.” We recall Israel’s official virologist Salman Zarka informing us that “[t]his is our life from now on, in waves.” We might say that the Welfare State is the first wave; “Democratic Socialism” is the second wave; full, undisguised socialism is the third; and the absolute tyranny of Communism is the fourth.

Admittedly, the analogy with the COVID regime partially breaks down since, in the transposition I’m proposing, the disease itself is the object and booster shots cannot be regarded as preventative. (Many will argue that this is the case with the medical pandemic as well, but the question is moot.) In the correlate scenario, however, the “boosters” should be thought of as social and cultural “injections” whose ulterior purpose is to prolong the virulence of the political pandemic.

For example, “health and safety” mandates — that is, official rhetoric — are designed to convince the people that they are being cared for, thus rendering them obedient and docile; or “vaccine passports” — that is, identity papers — are intended to fracture social unity by creating a compliant class of propagandized citizens and an outcast class subject to harsh measures of repression and exclusion.

The parallel may not be as far-fetched at it initially seems. After all, citizens of state collectives are conditioned to regard their political rulers as ostensible benefactors, having their best interests at heart. Those who resist — the politically “unvaccinated” — are regarded as malefactors, agents of subversion, enemies of the state, social pariahs, and finally as traitors to be interned, cast out, or otherwise punished.

In this comparison, what we call “escape variants” are merely specific aspects of the fourth wave, particular manifestations of social and political domination applying to local conditions.

The “new politics,” for which the COVID event is a convenient stalking horse and pretext — a “dress rehearsal” for the one-party state, writes Cheryl Chumley in Lockdown: The Socialist Plan to Take Away Your Freedom — will have become the authoritarian dispensation under which we would be condemned to live. And the new politics is the old politics redivivus, the pandemic of Leftism intent on annihilating the common, democratic life of rights and freedoms we have known and taken for granted for several generations past.

COVID is a virus that will be with us in perpetuity, like the common cold and the flu. The plague of Leftism in its various forms, issuing ultimately in Communism, is also a perpetual menace, circulating around the planet like the SARS virion. And as with any despotic regime, there will always be privileges and exemptions enjoyed by the governing elite but not by the governed: the freedom to break the rules, the advantage of accumulating capital, private and unobstructed travel, special favors for family, friends and collaborators, access to the best medical facilities, and the absolute exercise of power — precisely as we have seen with the COVID hierarchy of medical experts and political authorities.

The official response to COVID appears to be a strategy and preparation for something far more deadly, a pathology of governance based on economic threat, mass surveillance, police repression, and unitary state control, as we see developing in many Western countries such as Australia, Canada and the U.S. under Biden.

As Dr. Peter Breggin explains in his monumental COVID-19 and the Global Predators, it is a function of “military civil fusion [which is] the nature of the totalitarian state.”

We need to recognize that Communism advances on many fronts and, as noted, under various denominations, in its effort to revive Marx’s dream of global hegemony. Of course, the situation “on the ground” has changed since Marx’s day. Its new watchword may well be: Oligarchs of the World, Unite!

But we should make no mistake about this. Leftism is a superspreader. It is COVID by another name. It is a thought-virus with real-world consequences. It is the true pandemic.

Of course, we will never reach Communism-zero. There are no miracle vaccines against it, but there are therapeutic measures to halt the scope of its diffusion. As Breggin advises, “It shouldn’t make you helpless. It should rouse you to look with reason at what is happening in the world…unless we unite against the implementation of this plan, there will be no happy ending for any of us.”

Although the Leftist pathogen and its end point in Communism cannot be eradicated, it is, like COVID, treatable by sane and responsible measures: education, political wisdom, a knowledge of history, personal courage, a phalanx of patriots who will not be intimidated and who will not allow the Constitution to be trampled on, and, yes, where necessary, militant quarantine. Recovery is possible and herd immunity may be attainable. Or so we hope.

By David Solway

The current global crisis stems from a rejection of God

When we stop believing in God and sin, man starts believing in anything – and everything”

G.K. Chesterton

Cross in the Sunrise – Robert S. / Shutterstock.com

Oct 13, 2021 (WND News Center)

Judges 21:25 “In those days there was no king in Israel; every man did that which was right in his own eyes.”

Have we ever seen a time like this – in America – in the world?

It’s getting scary out there.

It’s been a rough nine months, hasn’t it been?

I’ve never witnessed anything like it. They say times like this try men’s souls.

Think about what we have seen. It started with an election gone wrong. We were cheated out of an honest, forthright, legitimate presidential vote – in America, the land of the free and the home of brave. Then everything started going awry. We couldn’t talk about it. No one was really talking about it – certainly not in the Big Media, not on Big Tech platforms. That would cause us to be canceled.

Then we were divided by vaccination status. If we had a card from the authorities indicating we received the shot, then we could get food, we could travel, we could keep our job. Otherwise, we would be canceled.

It reminds me of something I heard about the Antichrist in the end of days.

It’s almost enough to get you to stop believing in God. Or, maybe, to get you thinking seriously about Him – to get you devoted to Him.

But today we’re living amongst a generation that knows not Jesus – and things are getting worse.

The great British journalist-theologian G.K. Chesterton had it just about right when he explained what happens when people stop believing in God.

It’s true. They don’t just believe in nothing. They believe in anything and everything – every absurd notion, every myth and the perpetration of every unspeakable horror.

Chesterton was merely echoing biblical truths:

Genesis 6:5: “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”

Jeremiah 7:24: “But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.”

Romans 1:21: “Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.”

Yet, I think I’ve discovered a corollary to what Chesterton eloquently put into such memorable words. It’s not just what man does when he stops believing in God. It’s also what he does when he stops believing in the antithesis of God – namely the behavior God calls sin, or the transgression of His law.

The prophet Jeremiah explains what it looks like when people turn away from God or from belief in what God defines as transgressions of His law.

Jeremiah 18:12: “And they said, There is no hope: but we will walk after our own devices, and we will every one do the imagination of his evil heart.”

The Apostle Paul warned that we should expect things to get much worse in these latter days:

2 Timothy 3:13But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.”

Let’s face it, we live in an age of deception unparalleled since the Tower of Babel. The Tower of Google may indeed be worse. It’s not just fake news, it’s false prophets and phony gods. It’s idol worship and fake religions. It’s a return to Baal.

But here is scriptural truth:

1John 1:5-10 “This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.”

Do you believe in God?

Are you a child of light or a child of darkness?

Do you follow God and turn away from sin?

Or would you prefer to live in a godless world, a lawless world, a world in which man does what seems right in his own eyes?

Christians and non-Christians alike are today running from the law of God, from the commandments of Jesus.

The great evangelist Charles Spurgeon once said:

“Lower the Law and you dim the light by which man perceives his guilt; this is a very serious loss to the sinner rather than a gain; for it lessens the likelihood of his conviction and conversion. I say you have deprived the gospel of its ablest auxiliary [its most powerful weapon] when you have set aside the Law. You have taken away from it the schoolmaster that is to bring men to Christ. … They will never accept grace till they tremble before a just and holy Law. Therefore, the Law serves a most necessary purpose, and it must not be removed from its place.”

When we stop believing in God and sin, that’s what happens.

Man does not stop believing in anything. He starts believing in anything – and everything.

Choose God instead.

Choose the light.

By Joseph Farah

October 12, 2021

It’s time to get your kids out of America’s leftist-controlled public schools

Scrimp and save and do your best; it will not be perfect, but it will be better for your children than the indoctrination program that now confronts them.

Oct 11, 2021 (Catholic Culture) – Are you a domestic terrorist?

Let me rephrase the question. Are you concerned about what your children are being taught in American public schools?

(If you have no children, or if your children are beyond school age, then where I say “your children,” think of your nephews and nieces, your grandchildren, your younger brothers and sisters — or for that matter your neighbors’ children. You may not have as much at stake as the parents of young schoolchildren, but we all have a stake in the future of our society.)

  • Do you want your children introduced to the varieties of sexual activity — all varieties — when they are not yet 10 years old?
  • Do you want them to wear masks all day, so that don’t develop a natural ability to read facial expressions? And to be pressured to take a vaccine that they don’t need, with unknown long-term side effects?
  • Do you want them to learn that a male can become a female, and vice versa, by an act of will? And to acknowledge as a woman someone who has obviously male physical characteristics? Do you want them taught to assert as true something that their common sense tells them is untrue?
  • Do you want them to study critical race theory? To understand Western culture as a system of oppression and exploitation? To “cancel” historical figures who do not live up to the fashions of political correctness? To regret the founding of the United States and the introduction of Christianity to the Western hemisphere?
  • Do you want them to act out scenes of same-sex romance? To share bathrooms with members of the opposite sex?
  • Do you want them told that there are some things said and done in the classroom that should never be discussed at home: things their parents wouldn’t understand and should never know?

If you answered No to those questions, then for heaven’s sake get your children out of the public schools.

American public schools once provided children with a solid education, built upon an admittedly vague but discernibly Judeo-Christian moral framework. The public schools of the American past were ultimately controlled by the parents, and provided the sort of education that the parents wanted for their children. It’s time — past time — to recognize that those schools are gone.

For years religious parents have been swimming against the secularist tide, struggling to preserve (or maybe to recover) the old public-school tradition. Sad to say they have been losing, again and again, overwhelmed by the power of radicalized teachers’ unions and their political allies.

(If you happen to live in a community where public-school education still responds to the standards of the community, count your blessings. But don’t expect that situation to last. And by the way, are you sure that you should be satisfied? Have you looked into the latest curricular changes?)

It would be convenient, in some ways, to blame the deterioration of public education on the Democratic Party. Certainly the Democrats have danced obediently to the leftist tunes. But the situation has continued to deteriorate under Republican leadership as well. In fact it was a Republican administration that pushed for federalization of educational standards — thereby allowing radical activists to focus their lobbying efforts on Washington, secure in the knowledge that the victories they won there would be rolled out across the countryside.

And now the Biden administration has launched a campaign to silence any opposition to the radical educational agenda, with Attorney General Merrick Garland ordering the FBI to investigate “disruptions” of school-board meetings.

This utterly unprecedented federal order — an order to treat citizens as suspects if they express themselves too forcefully in public meetings — was issued because of an alleged “rise in criminal conduct directed toward school personnel.” But the National School Boards Association, which reported that rise in crime, could only cite one incident of alleged criminal activity.

So now if you object to something happening in your local public schools, you can bring your concerns to a school-board meeting. But be careful! If you raise your voice, or if a querulous school official claims to be intimidated, you might be the object of a federal investigation. You might even be investigated if someone else, who shares your views, crosses that invisible line.

Spirited public debate is still acceptable, the attorney general tells us. (And isn’t that nice of him, to allow free speech?) But he, and the FBI, will decide what is spirited debate and what is intimidation. Which means that in practice he and his political allies will be able to intimidate you.

You can continue to fight the good fight, with one hand tied behind your back. Or you can recognize that the public schools are now controlled by a cabal of forces hostile to your beliefs, and indifferent to your concerns.

Will it be easy to find an alternative to the public schools? No. It may involve real sacrifices — for parents and children alike. But many families have already made those sacrifices, and done so gladly, to preserve their children from the abuses of the current system.

Educate your children at home, if you cannot find another school. Find other parents who share your concerns and will match your commitment, and start your own school. Scrimp and save and do your best; it will not be perfect, but it will be better for your children than the indoctrination program that now confronts them. Don’t wait for the next outrage.

Don’t wait until your children are seriously hurt. Get them out of the public schools.


By Phil Lawler

Demand to know the curriculum, and ALL teaching materials on or off line, for EVERY CLASS your child is taking, especially: SEX ED, Ethnic Studies, Alt Lifestyles, Gender Theory, CRT disguised as “racial justice or anti-discrimination”, LGBT “History” – EVERY SINGLE CLASS!!! “Public” schools are, in reality “Government” schools. They are immoral, anti-American, anti-God, perverse indoctrination platforms geared always and only to the elitist liberal agenda with the goal of OWNING, warping and destroying your children’s minds and the traditional family, including the elimination of Fathers and natural masculinity, and ALL PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT in education!!!


October 11, 2021

Right At Your Door

1 h 31 min – 2007

Have you seen the above named movie? If not, consider watching it. At the rate the Biden administration and its Nazis are going, we can expect that what happens in this movie will happen to the unvaccinated…..

and in the near future



An who will stop him? You???

October 10, 2021

ConferenceThe Battle for America’s Classrooms: Fighting Indoctrination on a National Scale

Click HERE to View Videos From the Conference

October 9, 2021

The ‘Spirit-Murdering’ CRT Agenda

October 9, 2021 (American Thinker)

It is encouraging to see that at least some of the broader culture’s acceptance of CRT is waning, but we can be assured the zeal among CRT’s adherents will not wane. Therefore, we must mimic the radical left’s tactics and keep the pressure on, to reveal the whole vacuous pack of lies. Understanding CRT’s effects on people and reading what a rising CRT star—Bettina Love—wants to do to America’s Black students, help expose those lies.

The Democrat party’s radical left is a soul-crushing autocracy. Their ideologies do not empower anyone to pursue happiness or to succeed and are not what America’s youth need to be taught about our country or how to live and thrive in the greatest nation on earth. Leftists everywhere demand allegiance and compliance, and dissent cannot be tolerated, because a close examination of their doctrines exposes them as morally bankrupt and utterly insufficient.

It is not racist to say CRT and its activists are wrong. It would be racist to acquiesce to the falsehoods, inherent racism, and bigotry espoused in their ideologies and to allow them to go unchallenged. There are more than sufficient real-life examples to prove how wrong they are.

Let’s try a sports analogy. Suppose there were two teams. The teams’ racial diversity is inconsequential; both teams possess sufficient talent to compete at the requisite level and to meet one another in sanctioned competition. Imagine there is one big difference—one team acknowledges and competes according to the rules of the game. The other team does not, either because its players lack knowledge of, preparation for, or regard for the rules of competition.

Sports competition is analogous to real life. Every member of the team has his or her unique talents, gifts, and abilities. For the individual players and the team to succeed (for the system to work) all members of the team makes the best use of their abilities and play by the rules. Moreover, there is an abiding culture in which “sportsmanship” and acceptable behavior enhance and reinforce the rules of the game.

Imagine the chaos that would ensue during the game if one team played by the rules and one did not. According to the rules, penalties would be called and enforced. The infractions could prevent the penalized team from scoring points and the game might end in a crushing and embarrassing defeat. Worse, if the infractions continued and were severe enough, that team might be permanently disqualified from competing.

In this analogy, the Left would protest “the system” and the rules of the game as unjust. They would deny their loss was a legitimate consequence because their team failed to abide by the rules or compete in good sportsmanship, which could have allowed them to win. The Left has an unrelenting desire to see every inequity as an injustice and the inherent inequality in life’s outcomes among individuals and among people of different races as evidence that the “system” is irredeemably flawed.

Enforcing the rules is not racist, and neither is playing by the rules to succeed and win in life.

Bettina Love may be less known outside the CRT activist sphere of influence than her comrades Ibrahim X. Kendi, Nicole Hannah-Jones, or Robyn DiAngelo but, according to Gabe Kaminsky, writing at The Federalist, her profile and influence are rapidly rising. She is an “anti-racist” professor at the University of Georgia, and her 2019 book, We Want to Do More Than Survive has been called the most up-to-date and unvarnished presentation of the CRT movement in education. Kaminsky quotes Love:

schools have participated in “the spirit murdering of Black and Brown children” since there is “a death that is built on racism and intended to reduce, humiliate, and destroy people of color.”

In a 30 July 2021 column in National Review, Stanley Kurtz writes,[Love] disdains the efforts of educators and policymakers to instill in “dark children” traits like problem solving, zest, self-advocacy, grit, optimism, self-control, curiosity, and gratitude. Love considers education designed to encourage character traits like hard work, discipline, and personal responsibility to be anti-Black.

A thorough read and clear-eyed assessment of the articles quoted above should leave little doubt that Bettina Love’s goal (along with CRT) is to abolish not only America’s capitalist economic system but America itself.

That goal is concerning enough (abolish America to replace it with what?) but the “indictment” she presents, that the educational system has been “spirit murdering” people of color, is patently false. In her words, American education is “anti-Black” because it teaches “dark children” foundational values and norms such as hard work, discipline, personal responsibility, self-control, problem-solving, joy, self-advocacy, optimism, and gratitude.

In her own words and by their literal meaning, Love is saying either one of two things:

  • people of color are incapable of those attributes, attitudes, and values she listed, and teaching them is abusive, or
  • those attributes, attitudes, and values are not what is necessary for people of color to thrive and succeed.

Either possible conclusion is so utterly flawed that both should be rejected outright, forcefully, and in the most explicit terms.

I cannot think of a more insulting attitude toward any person of any race or ethnicity than to tell them those beneficial personal values and qualities that lead to success are not attributable to them because of their race or ethnicity. Also, it is the epitome of the “soft bigotry of low expectations.” It is not racist to expect anyone, of any race or ethnicity, to behave in a manner that is a proven path to success.

It is supremely ironic that the title of her book, and what she advocates, are so diametrically opposite. As an educator or mentor, Love’s position is bankrupt and should be rejected. Can there be any worse advice? Yet those are the tenets of the BLM movement and CRT adherents.

Therefore, we reach the inescapable conclusions that CRT is not about building up people of color, but is a “spirit-murdering,” soul-crushing worldview. The Colorado father who in August 2021 addressed his local school board said it best, that racism in America would “by and large be dead” except that there are institutions “keeping it on life support.”

In Critical Theory, from its Marxist origins to Critical Race Theory, every facet and nuance is meant to crush the souls of people of color by exploiting an attitude of victimization and to crush the souls of White people with the guilt attributed to the color of their skin. By destroying our faith in ourselves and in one another, they seek to destroy America and the free-market economy that has created more prosperity than any other in the world.

They want to burn it all down. Their goal is to rebuild it into a system that has never worked in human history and it will not work now.

There is nothing about CRT that can be of any earthly good to anyone. By its adherents’ rejection of the timeless values that are critical to an individual’s success, CRT crushes the soul. It is a pernicious lie and is the “spirit-murdering” ideological cancer metastasizing in our culture. Like any illness, must be cured or it will kill its host.

By Jeff M. Lewis

Food Prices Hit Highest Level in a Decade

October 9, 2021 (American Thinker)

Food prices across the world have risen to their highest levels in a decade on the back of tightening supply conditions robust demand, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

The FAO’s food price index, which measures world food commodity prices, has surged by 32.8 percent in the 12 months through September, coming in at a reading of 130 points, a level not seen since 2011. On a month-over-month basis, the index rose 1.2 percent.

Accounting for the bulk of the rise in the index were higher prices of most cereals and vegetable oils.

The FAO vegetable oil price index was up 60 percent in September compared to a year earlier, and 1.7 percent up from August. The cereal price measure was up 27.3 percent over the year last month, and 2 percent from August.

Dairy and sugar prices also rose in September by an over-the-year 15.2 percent and 53.5 percent, respectively, while the meat price index was up 26.3 percent above its level a year ago.

While much of the inflation story has been focused on surging energy costs and products impacted by the semiconductor chip shortage like used cars, rising food cost signals are increasingly flashing red.

As the U.S. economy rebounds, packaged food companies are grappling with inflation, with Conagra Brands Inc. saying on Oct. 7 that it would increase prices again on its frozen meals and snacks.

Conagra said it was facing rising costs of ingredients including edible oils, proteins, and grains forcing it to increase prices on frozen goods by 3.5 percent and on staple meals by 3.3 percent.

Food-makers General Mills, Campbell Soup, and J.M. Smucker have also raised wholesale prices in response to rising ingredient and freight costs.

Pork and beef prices have surged in the past few months, while the Labor Department’s August inflation report showed that meat, poultry, fish, and eggs were up 8 percent over the last year and 15.7 percent from prices in August 2019, before the pandemic. Beef prices jumped 12.2 percent over the past year, and bacon was up 17 percent during the same period.

Experts say increasing energy costs around the world could exacerbate the problem.

It’s this combination of things that’s beginning to get very worrying,” Abdolreza Abbassian, senior economist at the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, told Bloomberg in a recent interview. “It’s not just the isolated food-price numbers, but all of them together. I don’t think anyone two or three months ago was expecting the energy prices to get this strong.”

Food price inflation is also driving up consumer expectations for future price increases.

The New York Fed’s August survey of consumer expectations showed that Americans anticipate food prices to rise by 7.9 percent in a year, higher than the overall inflation expectation of 5.2 percent.

Federal Reserve officials have repeatedly characterized the current bout of inflation as “transitory” though they have increasingly expressed concern about the risk of a de-anchoring of inflationary expectations. That’s where confidence in the “transitory” narrative falls and people start to believe and behave as if inflation will be far stickier than previously believed, impacting wage and price-setting behavior and potentially even sparking the kind of upward wage-price spiral that bedeviled the economy in the 1970s.

By Tom Ozimek

Emel Akan and Reuters contributed to this report

October 8, 2021 (Supplement)



Hint: It’s not you or me!

Don’t wait for controlling leftist political sadistic power-crazy Nazis to knock at your door before fighting back, for where there is no freedom, there is no future.

George Orwell’s book “1984”

October 7, 2021 (Supplement)

Pull your kids out of public school if you want to save them from LGBT propaganda

Oct 4, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – One of the few encouraging trends we’ve seen in the last couple of years is the increasing pushback by parents against the implementation of transgender ideology (and other progressive agenda items such as Critical Race Theory) in their schools.

For years, progressive teachers and school boards have had a free hand to educate children as they see fit, and for years their views have been getting increasingly radical. As children begin to suddenly identify as the opposite gender overnight and become indoctrinated into ideas that were considered extreme very recently, many parents are finally getting wise.

That’s why they’re showing up at school board meetings and demanding accountability—something that progressive politicians and educators are very, very unhappy with. They are beginning to stonewall parents, and we should pay careful attention to what they are saying right now, because they are tipping their hand.

In response to a question asking if parents are the “primary stakeholder” in the education of their children, for example, President Joe Biden’s Education Secretary Miguel Cardona was blunt: “I believe parents are important stakeholders, but I also believe that educators have a role in determining educational programming.” He refused to say that parents were the “primary stakeholder” in what their children are taught at school.

That’s because progressives don’t believe that parents should interfere with what they wish to teach America’s children.

Terry McAuliffe, the Democratic candidate for governor of Virginia, was even more to the point. During a gubernatorial debate, he stated that: “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.” In other words, parents should shut up and let people who think like he does teach their children that there are dozens of genders; that they may have been born into the wrong body; that everything they are taught at home is, essentially, wrong — if not actually evil.

Schools want to turn kids into “allies” — but not to their parents. No, they want kids to be allies to the LGBT movement.

McAuliffe did clarify his statement somewhat, just in case anyone had understood the implications of his position on parental rights, noting that he is “not going to let parents come into schools, and actually take books out, and make their own decision.”

Classics such as To Kill A Mockingbird are already getting tossed from public schools; but any parent upset by LGBT propaganda will need to suck it up. As far as progressives are concerned, the kids belong to the state, and they are teaching the children what the state wants them to believe.

Despite the incredible pace at which progressives conquered elite institutions, many are aware that most parents are not teaching their children that they may actually be the opposite sex or, for that matter, that they may be neither gender. This means that they need to teach children these things at school with radical sex education, perverse “children’s” propaganda books, LGBT kid’s entertainment, and Drag Queen Story Hour. This has been going on for quite some time now, which is why so many parents are getting upset and getting involved.

Progressives appear shocked by this pushback. The pandemic gave many parents an opportunity to see the sort of trash their children are being fed at school, and to the dismay of the indoctrinators, are demanding a say.

In response, school boards are trying to cut parents off; cut them out; and push them out of the process. And top Democratic politicians, from Terry McAuliffe to Joe Biden’s Education Secretary, are stating publicly that they side with the so-called educators over the parents. These educators, after all, are also producing future Democratic voters.

Pull your kids out of public school.

Jonathan Van Maren

In his 1/2 century in politics, what one thing has Biden done to improve YOUR life??? As always, thank Biden voters for letting the government through school indoctrination corrupt your kids and make them ungrateful for living in the greatest country on earth.

October 8, 2021

George Orwell was Right

October 8, 2021 (American Thinker) – From George Orwell’s 1984 “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building renamed, every date has been altered.  And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute.  History has stopped.  Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”  And to paraphrase Orwell’s Animal Farm, the paint is not yet dry on the side of the barn, and they are already changing the rules to benefit themselves…the Deep State.  

This is Joe Biden’s America today.

It is so horribly unbelievable how far we have fallen since 2015.  The America of Biden and the Deep State is unrecognizable to when candidate Donald Trump came down the escalators at Trump Towers in 2015.  The Deep State has totally revealed itself, and thus far without impunity.  It is hard to call America a democratic republic today.  A liberal democracy under Biden, it is not.  It is difficult with an honest intellectual argument to say Americans are free today. 

This is what Jefferson, Franklin, Madison, Lincoln, and Reagan had been warning us about.  “Freedom is only one generation away from extinction” by RR. 

Make no mistake about it, this dystopian government has come from the Left; the Progressive Left. This Orwellian tyranny has come from the Democratic Socialists.  This China/Venezuela/Cuba type regime has come from the Deep State.  The Progressives (Socialists/Globalists/Deep State) have now turned America into a Orwellian novel in which we don’t know what the final chapter will be. 

If you are now scared for America’s and your grandchildren’s future…you should be.  We don’t know if the final chapter ends with heroes akin to Bunker Hill, Normandy, Iwo Jima, and the First Responders that went up the Twin Towers.  Or.  Does the final chapter end with a 1,000 years of darkness? 

One question must be asked of the regime that placed Biden in the White House.  Who is actually in charge?  Who is making the decisions?  Who is demanding these new Nazi-like rules/regulations/procedures?  Who is making the final call?  Who has now said parents demanding to be heard at local school board meeting are now domestic terrorists?  Soccer moms in prison with radical Islamic terrorists?  WT* ?  Who is keeping American citizens charged with simple  trespassing in solidity confinement in prison?  Who has instructed the FBI to arrest parents for domestic terrorism?  Who has demanded “Google searches” now to be looked up for “wrong think,”  for crimes against the state?  Who continues to call a therapeutic a vaccine, when with this vaccine, you can still get the disease and also pass it to others?  That’s not a true vaccine.   Who states the violent riots from BLM/Antifa are constitutional protected free speech, while peaceful protests demanding a free and fair election of 2020 are the doing of insurrectionists? 

Who is in charge of the Big Tech Social Media when they decide what words are “hate speech” and punishable by prison, while left wing/anti-Trump speech is constitutionally protected?  Who decided that censorship by Big Tech Social Media of all the Patriot (Conservative/Christian/Constitutional) speech, ideas, and thoughts is an American thing to do?  What American in their right mind has decided that putting America First is xenophobic, racists, and evil?  What person decided that opening our borders to illegal immigration, allowing illegals to come into our country illegally, was constitutional and legal?  

Who decided that it was noble and justified to have a five year coup on a duly elected president…oh that’s cool somehow; but at the same time states questioning the presidential election of 2020 is treasonous?  Who made the decision to leave Americans behind in Afghanistan to a certain torture and death?  Who made the decision to divide Americans by race and create further animosity between the races by demanding Critical Race Theory be taught in our public schools?  Who has decided that hating people based on race color is now O.K.?  Who made the decision that America did not start in 1776, but actually began with slavery in 1619?  Who made the decision that America should not have borders?  Who made the decision to allow China to become the de facto leader of the world?   

Whoever he, she, or they are; it is evil.  Pure evil.  They are trying to destroy America.

One thing that seems obvious: it was not Joe Biden.  One thing seems certain, it was not the guy who was placed in the Oval Office.  One thing seems without question, the figurehead in the White House is not making the final call.  He is incapable of doing this.  He does not have the mental stamina, the intellectual girth, nor the energy level needed to carry this out.  Nor the capacity to demand it get done.  Biden is not the puppetmaster, he’s the puppet.  Whether it is Susan Rice or Barack Obama, or even Ms. Jill Biden, we don’t know.  Whether it is the permanent Deep State apparatuses, or George Soros, or Dr. Anthony Fauci, or Bill Gates — we’re not sure.  If it is China making the final call, (which should make Taiwan very nervous), it is unclear but possible.  It would not be hard to argue that the globalists in the New World Order are making the final call.  But who or whomever it is, it doesn’t seem to be the present resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  He is incapable.  Remember the last six months of the presidential campaign, he basically hid in the basement, while the Deep State, left-wing media, and China/COVID took the election from Trump.

As Orwell has similarly written; every day seems darker, every moment seems more unjust, and every edict seems so un-American. 

The Progressives will not stop unless the Patriots demand it.  Will Americans allow themselves to walk into the “cattle cars” without  fighting back?  Will Americans allow themselves to be placed in reeducation camps to “learn more.”  Evangelicals had better not allow their church doors to be shuttered again, because if they do, they might not reopen.  The leadership of the GOP had better rise up and say “no” to lockdowns or worse, and “we will not comply.” 

Where is the Supreme Court?  Where is the ACLU?   Where is Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Tom Cotton? Patriots need them to take a stand and to take a risk.  Trump, Ron DeSantis, and Tucker Carlson are doing their part.  But there must be more leadership and more voices from the “unwashed masses.”  Otherwise, there will be a lot of parents who do not believe in CRT, who do not believe in gender fluidity, and who believe that they themselves, these parents, are the ones God has placed in leadership of their children’s education.  These parents might in the end wind up at Guantanamo Bay as domestic terrorists, cellmates with radical Islamic terrorists.  We had always thought the Patriot Act was for the likes of Osama Bin Laden; now we realize it’s for us!  Orwell did not know America, but he did know the evil that lies in the hearts of men who have too much power.

By Andrew W. Coy

October 7, 2021

Asymptomatic spread is virtually non-existent

Oct 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Asymptomatic spread is virtually non-existent, and if this does occur, it accounts for fewer than 1% of cases.

Asymptomatic spread is very rare, and we have very limited and questionable evidence of it happening at all. We have no documented proof, no documented evidence of this occurring in any appreciable manner. I argue that the concept of asymptomatic spread for COVID-19 was a falsehood and a means both to deceive and mislead then-President Trump and the nation and to drive fear and paranoia. The myth of asymptomatic spread was pure propaganda in my view, based on what I present below. It is one of the narratives about the virus, similar to the issue of recurrent infection, that has not been proven by anyone, and it is used to drive the illogical, irrational, specious, and unscientific lockdowns, school closures, and mask mandates. This crisis is mainly a pandemic of fear and propaganda by government bureaucrats, the technocrats, the uninformed dishonest media, and the absurd television medical advisors.

How did this issue of ‘asymptomatic spread’ come about? Spread of a pathogen will occur more surely when the carriers are sick with symptoms, especially if the symptoms function to expel the pathogen into the surrounding air. Having no symptoms or very mild symptoms reduces the risk of spread, and with no symptoms, spread is basically removed. This is the same for SARS-CoV-2 virus, and a recent BMJ publication pretty well concludes that asymptomatic COVID carriers are rarely the drivers they were thought to be.

This is basic immunology and should not be changed for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). I am being emphatic in saying there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread. I also recognize that I must be careful not to claim ‘zero,’ for the evidence changes daily and rapidly, and absence of documented evidence is also not a reason to rule it out entirely. It may just have not been studied yet or documented optimally. But I am confident enough based on the existing literature to agree  that ‘it is a dangerous assumption to believe that there is persuasive, scientific evidence of asymptomatic transmission’.

The basis for the societal lockdowns was that 40% to 50% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 could potentially spread it, even though asymptomatic. “But fears that the virus may be spread to a significant degree by asymptomatic carriers soon led government leaders to issue broad and lengthy stay-at-home orders and mask mandates out of concerns that anyone could be a silent spreader.” However, the evidence in support of common asymptomatic spread remains largely non-existent and, I argue, was overstated and may have been made with no basis.  It’s existence was a bogus claim by the administration, by the medical advisors, then, meant to drive fear, and it continues to this day when they know they are deceiving the public.

A high-quality review study by Madewell, published in JAMA sought to estimate the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in households and determine factors that modify this parameter. In addition, researchers sought to estimate the proportion of households with index cases that had any secondary transmission, and also compared the SARS-CoV-2 household secondary attack rate with that of other severe viruses and with that to close contacts for studies that reported the secondary attack rate for both close and household contacts.

The study was a meta-analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 participants. Secondary attack rates represented the spread to additional persons, and researchers found a 25-fold increased risk within households between symptomatic positive infected index persons versus asymptomatic infected index persons. “Household secondary attack rates were increased from symptomatic index cases (18.0%; 95% CI, 14.2%-22.1%) than from asymptomatic index cases (0.7%; 95% CI, 0%-4.9%)”. This study showed just how rare asymptomatic spread was within a confined household environment.

From the nearly 2 million children who were followed in school in Sweden, it was reported that with no mask mandates, there were zero deaths from Covid and only a few instances of transmission and minimal hospitalization.

In the UK, the “Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies” recommended that “[p]rioritizing rapid testing of symptomatic people is likely to have a greater impact on identifying positive cases and reducing transmission than frequent testing of asymptomatic people in an outbreak area.”

A study published in Nature found no instances of asymptomatic spread from positive asymptomatic cases among all 1,174 close contacts of the cases, based on a base sample of 10 million people. “There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases”. AIER’s Zucker responded this way: “The conclusion is not that asymptomatic spread is rare or that the science is uncertain. The study revealed something that hardly ever happens in these kinds of studies. There was not one documented case. Forget rare. Forget even Fauci’s previous suggestion that asymptomatic transmission exists but not does drive the spread. Replace all that with: never. At least not in this study for 10,000,000.”  LifeSiteNews reported similarly.

A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers was carried out by Goa et al. Researchers looked at the 455 contacts who were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier. They were divided into three groups: 35 patients, 196 family members, and 224 hospital staff. “No severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was detected in 455 contacts by nucleic acid test”.

The World Health Organization (WHO) also made the claim that asymptomatic spread/transmission is rare, and yet this issue of asymptomatic spread is the key issue being used to force vaccination in children. The science remains contrary to this proposed policy mandate. Even Dr. Fauci of NIAID said asymptomatic transmission is rare, and that an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.

As an update that has come 19 months too late, the WHO recommended on June 29 2021 that there be no testing of asymptomatic persons. This is after trillions of dollars have been sucked out of economies and many lives lost due to sudden unemployment and closures of societies and schools. Many people killed themselves because of the unscientific and illogical testing policy of asymptomatic persons.

Additionally, a high-quality, robust study in the French Alps examined the spread of COVID-19 virus via a cluster of COVID-19. Researchers followed one infected child who visited three different schools and interacted with other children, teachers, and various adults. They reported no instance of secondary transmission despite close interactions. These data have been available to the CDC and other health experts for over a year. As mentioned earlier, Ludvigsson published a seminal paper in the New England Journal of Medicine on COVID-19 among children 1 to 16 years of age and their teachers in Sweden. 

A June 10, 2021 op-ed sheds more confirmatory light that asymptomatic spread was more a myth than a reality. Ballan and Tindall wrote, “People presenting with symptoms of COVID-19 are almost exclusively responsible for transmitting SARS-CoV-2. Serious infection usually results from frequent exposure to high doses of SARS-CoV-2, such as health care workers caring for sick COVID-19 patients in hospitals or nursing homes and people living in the same household.”

I conclude that we were fooled and scared into shutting down our lives and our economies with the following untruths and misleading positions:

1) that we are all at equal risk of severe outcomes if infected, e.g., 15-year-old Johnny and his 90-year-old granny;

2) that asymptomatic spread is a real thing although after 19 months it has not been proven;

3) that recurrent infection is a real thing although after 19 months it has not been proven;

4) that vaccine immunity with the narrow ‘immature’ spike-specific Wuhan strain library of immunity is superior to natural exposure immunity that we know is broad, robust, durable, and often life-long;

5) that the RT-PCR test with its 97% false positive rate above cycle counts of 30 or so is credible;

6) that there was no early drug treatment when we knew that there were safe, effective, cheap, and available treatments available day one in this emergency;  and

7) a vaccine was the only way out of this emergency.

These seven lies along with CDC’s failed botched testing early in the response (March/April 2020) blinded the US’s response and kept the US blind for five weeks, allowing the virus to seed across the eastern and western flanks of the nation. This testing failure by the CDC was catastrophic to the US initial response and may have harmed it irreparably. These above-mentioned errors severely damaged President Trump’s response, and he was greatly misled by his advisors. He must be praised for his efforts, but it was clear daily on the White House podium that he was being worked against and the emergency response almost daily became a clown car showy. I do praise Giroir for trying to fix the devastation of CDC’s botched testing.

Importantly, now we see the vaccine failing against the Delta variant in many places e.g. UK, Israel, Iceland, Gibraltar, and the USA, and infections are principally emerging among double vaccinated persons, as well as hospitalizations, severe illness, and deaths. Vaccinated persons are potentially transmitting the virus and harboring massive loads orally and in their nasal passages.

But to recap, the points mentioned above harmed the USA’s response and damaged President Trump’s efforts, and also the efforts of other nations that followed the USA and took guidance from them.

By Paul Elias Alexander, PhD