Children are effectively immune to COVID-19: here’s the evidence
September 21, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — There is biological and molecular evidence that children are effectively COVID immune and can be considered already vaccinated.
Yes, children are already vaccinated and need no COVID vaccine. Leave them alone. COVID injections offer children no opportunity for benefit and only potential opportunities for harm.
Children must not be vaccinated with these COVID vaccines; the key issue is that the vaccines are not needed. No public health official has yet made an argument explaining why children are to get these vaccines. Moreover, the developers have not followed the vaccines for the proper duration of time, and this is very troubling for we thus do not know what the future will hold for recipients.
I am no anti-vaxxer; I support vaccines, but they must be properly developed. These COVID vaccines were not developed properly in terms of research methodology, the duration of follow-up, and the lack of proper safety testing. The resulting estimates are questionable, especially the manner in which they are presented to the public. They are meant to deceive. The public has been lied to.
We have no idea how these vaccines will behave longer-term in children, and they might severely harm our children or even kill them. Children have a natural protection in that they do not have the molecular and biological basis adults do to be infected by this virus and to get severely ill. I am warning the FDA that if they approve this vaccine for children, we run the risk of killing thousands of American children (and global children), harming them with myocarditis and other serious conditions of which they have been spared of thus far by their natural protection. The vaccine and spike protein enter the circulation and can have devastating consequences to the vasculature in our children. They may cause clots, bleeding/hemorrhaging, etc.
There is no reason for this drive to put the vaccine into children, no sound reason or justification, and the CDC and NIH and NIAID continue to be flat wrong on this. There is no medical reason, and I plead with the FDA to stop this. Children are not meant to protect adults, and we do not need immunity from children to end the pandemic. We have early treatment.
Yes, we must properly double- and triple-down protect our elderly and high risk and offer treatment early, but we must not disregard the natural immunity already built up in society, and the immunity children already possess. The more recent disaster to children of the dengvaxia vaccine for dengue fever provides caution. Children were seriously harmed from it.
The estimated Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) is close to zero for children and young adults. Pandemic Data (PANDA) reports that the IFR for those <19 years is 0.003%. Andrew Levin reported that the estimated age-specific IFR was 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25. Comparatively, the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) reported the IFR as follows: 0-4 years, mean 0.003%, 5-9 years, mean 0.001%, 10-14 years, mean 0.001%, 15-19 years, mean 0.003%, 20-24 years, mean 0.006%. The most updated data by the American Academy of Pediatrics showed that “Children were 0.00%-0.19% of all COVID-19 deaths, and 10 [US] states reported zero child deaths. In states reporting, 0.00%-0.03% of all child Covid-19 cases resulted in death.
As to a biological and molecular understanding of the risk, I have brought the evidence together in a hypothesis that children are already immune and vaccinated. In fact, their immunity is better than those of adults vaccinated with these sub-optimal spike-specific injections that confer a very immature library of immune response. We have strong research by Patel and Bunyavanich (ACE 2 receptor research), Loske (showing that pre-activated antiviral innate immunity [mucosal compartment] in the upper airways of children), Yang (children have memory B cells that can bind to SARS-CoV-2, indicating the potent role of early [prior] childhood exposure to common cold coronaviruses), Weisberg and Farber et al. (children’s T cells are relatively naïve and mostly untrained, and thus a better capacity to respond to novel viruses), and Galow (showing that children do not spread COVID-19 to other children, while it is adults who spread COVID-19 to children).
This is the biological hypothesis, but what about the epidemiological observational type studies? A high-quality, robust study in the French Alps examined the spread of COVID-19 virus via a cluster of COVID-19 cases. They followed one infected child who visited three different schools and interacted with other children, teachers, and various other adults. The authors reported no instance of secondary transmission despite close interactions. These data have been available to the CDC and other health experts for over a year.
Jonas Ludvigsson published a seminal paper in the New England Journal of Medicine on COVID-19 among children aged 1 to 16 and their teachers in Sweden. From the nearly 2 million schoolchildren who were followed in Sweden, with no mask mandates, it was reported that there were zero deaths from COVID and only a few instances of transmission and minimal hospitalization.
Again, children have a natural ACE 2 protection, and we must not bypass it by entering their deltoids and then their blood streams. They have been spared of the deaths so far that have occurred in adults due to the vaccines, and it is because of this natural protection and the molecular reasons I have outlined above. Leave them alone.
Children need no COVID vaccine; it can potentially kill them. The CDC and NIH and vaccine developers are deceiving the nation and have not done the proper research. This is highly reckless and dangerous. Dr. Anthony Fauci must stop this madness, this lunacy, this relentless drive he has to inject all the children. To this day he cannot explain why. It was always illogical, irrational, nonsensical, and without any scientific merit. President Trump must come forward and at least stand his ground on these injections not entering the arms of our children. There is just too much risk. Parents must stand up and reject this lunacy by Fauci, Collins, Walensky, and the reckless, specious, television medical experts.
In closing, history teaches us to pause and reflect upon our previous miscues and unforced blunders that had significant consequences. It behooves us to remember the increased incidence of narcolepsy in children in Scandinavian countries following the H1N1 influenza ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine used for the 2009 pandemic (Pandemrix influenza vaccination program). Additionally, the harms caused by the dengue vaccine in children in the Philippines also come to mind. Sanofi Pasteur halted the vaccines in 2017 due to the very dangerous risk of plasma leakage syndrome akin to ebola. The tainted polio vaccine that sickened and fatally paralyzed children in 1955 in the United States is also worthy of review in this context. Harm can accrue from a rapid deployment of mass vaccination to children has not proven to be safe in all cases. Perhaps this comment by Dr. Efrat Schurr is worth noting: “In 1977, for example, a triple vaccination (against diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus) from a defective batch left several children blind, deaf and disabled forever.”
Children are effectively COVID immune and can be considered already fully vaccinated as per the biological and molecular explanation above.
By Dr. Paul Elias Alexander
Canadian province’s order allows gov’t to take one’s personal property without a warrant
September 22, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A Canadian provincial government enacted Orwellian-like emergency powers in the name of fighting COVID that allow for officials to detain or remove people without a warrant and seize personal property at will.
Under new health orders, the Saskatchewan minister may “authorize the entry into any building or on any land, without warrant, by any person in the course of implementing an emergency plan.”
The government is also afforded the power to “cause the evacuation of persons and the removal of persons or livestock and personal property from any area of Saskatchewan that is or may be affected by an emergency and make arrangements for the adequate care and protection of those persons or livestock and of the personal property.”
The new Provincial Emergency Order under The Emergency Planning Act was signed September 13, by Premier Scott Moe. The orders were announced by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Health.
According to the ministry of health, the new orders are needed to “provide for health system labor mobility through greater flexibility in scheduling and redirecting health care workers to areas experiencing capacity pressures and in the use of supplementary resources.”
The new emergency health powers allow the government to “assume direction and control of the emergency response of a local authority.”
They also give the government the power to “acquire or utilize any real or personal property that the minister considers necessary to prevent, combat or alleviate the effects of an emergency.”
As part of this order, the government reactivated the terms of a Letter of Understanding with the Saskatchewan Health Authority and a slew of provincial unions, including the Saskatchewan Union of Nurses and Health Sciences Association of Saskatchewan.
The Letter of Understanding spells out how the government can force the “temporary redeployment of health care employees to meet the anticipated increase in COVID-19 health care needs.”
Every person residing in Saskatchewan is mandated by law to follow the new emergency orders or face severe penalties or possible jail time.
The new orders came about after the government declared a “fourth wave” of COVID-19 spurred by the “Delta variant.”
The province with a population of around one million currently says 262 people are in hospital due to COVID-19.
On September 17, Dr. Saqub Shahab, the province’s chief medical health officer, issued a mandatory interim isolation and face-covering order as a stop-gap until the province’s vaccine passport comes into effect in October.
Moe recently said his government was “too patient” with those who have not had the COVID jabs while introducing a vaccine passport.
Moe’s words against the unvaccinated also included a line that, although he never wanted to “implement” a vaccine passport, his “patience has come to an end” with the un-jabbed.
Starting October 1, one must show proof of vaccination or a negative test to eat indoors, go to entertainment venues, attend conferences or large events, or participate in indoor fitness centers.
All Canadian provinces have for a long time had the power to enact such draconian rules, which in effect limit people’s rights in a time of emergency, but using a “health” emergency to do so is unheard of in modern times.
The province of Alberta also recently declared a public emergency under its Public Health Act. Like Saskatchewan, the government can enter buildings without a warrant or seize personal property.
Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, despite promising his province would be open “for good,” introduced a COVID-19 vaccine passport recently. He has also enacted new rules banning “unvaccinated” people from gathering in their private homes.
John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), said that by “virtue” of the Kenney government limiting the fully jabbed to “indoor social interactions of no more than 10 people,” the government “acknowledges that vaccinated people are spreaders of viruses.”
“What evidence does the government rely on for its belief that unvaccinated people are worse spreaders of viruses than vaccinated people,” Carpay said in a statement sent to LifeSiteNews.
“Premier Kenney has joined Prime Minister Trudeau in scapegoating, demonizing and vilifying the minority of unvaccinated individuals.”
The COVID-19 injections approved for emergency use in Canada, including the Pfizer jab for ages 12 and up, all have connections to cells derived from aborted babies.
All four have also been associated with possible severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young, healthy men.
The list of FDA-recognized adverse events has grown from severe anaphylactic reactions to include fatal thrombotic events, the inflammatory heart condition myocarditis, and neurologically disabling diseases like Guillain Barré Syndrome. Meanwhile, the CDC reported a COVID-19 infection survival rate of greater than 99.95% for those under age 50.
By Anthony Murdoch